The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9695·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 15, 2026

McCarty and Heideman Air Safety Enhancement Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Bentz, Cliff [R-OR-2]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 15, 2026

Bottom line

This bill requires the FAA to review and potentially update low-altitude airspace safety regulations, with a particular focus on marking temporary obstructions and improving hazard information for pilots.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator to conduct a comprehensive review of existing policies and regulations concerning low-altitude airspace safety within six months of enactment. The review must specifically consider issues such as obstruction marking for temporary hazards like slacklines, improving aeronautical information products, enhancing coordination with land management agencies, and evaluating the sufficiency of current penalties for airspace violations. If the review determines that policies for temporary obstructions are inadequate, the Administrator must update relevant regulations within one year.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for enhancing aviation safety by addressing specific, often overlooked, hazards in low-altitude airspace, such as unmarked slacklines, which pose a significant risk to low-flying aircraft like helicopters and agricultural planes. They believe it will lead to clearer guidelines, better information dissemination, and improved coordination among agencies, ultimately preventing accidents and saving lives by adapting regulations to modern airspace uses.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that existing FAA regulations are already sufficient or that adding more specific mandates could lead to unnecessary bureaucracy or overregulation. They might also contend that the focus on specific temporary obstructions like slacklines is too narrow and that resources could be better spent on broader aviation safety initiatives. However, given the safety-focused nature of a review, direct organized opposition is unlikely to be widespread.

The bill is very short and easily digestible, allowing ample time for a thorough review and understanding of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Review of FAA Policies and Regulations Related to Low-Altitude Airspace Safety

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates the FAA Administrator to conduct a comprehensive review of current FAA policies and regulations related to low-altitude airspace safety within six months of the bill's enactment. The review must involve consultation with various aviation stakeholders and consider specific areas for improvement, including obstruction marking for temporary hazards like slacklines, enhancing aeronautical information products, improving inter-agency coordination, and evaluating the sufficiency of existing penalties for airspace violations.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupHelicopter and powered-lift aircraft operators and pilotsImpactPotentially increased safety due to clearer operational guidelines and better hazard identification.MechanismScale
GroupAir medical operatorsImpactReduced risk during critical low-altitude operations, especially in emergency situations where unmarked hazards are particularly dangerous.MechanismScale
GroupGeneral aviation pilots and aircraft ownersImpactImproved awareness of hazards and enhanced overall safety in low-altitude flight.MechanismScale
GroupAgricultural aviation operatorsImpactSafer operations in low-altitude environments, reducing the risk of striking unmarked objects during spraying or other agricultural activities.MechanismScale
GroupUncrewed aircraft system operatorsImpactPotential for clearer guidelines regarding low-altitude operations and hazard identification, improving integration into the national airspace system.MechanismScale
GroupNon-aviation communities (e.g., slackliners, outdoor recreationists)ImpactMay face new requirements for marking temporary obstructions, leading to increased awareness of aviation safety rules and potential compliance costs.MechanismScale
GroupFederal, State, Tribal, and local land management agenciesImpactImproved coordination with the FAA, potentially leading to new responsibilities in identifying and managing aviation hazards on lands they oversee.MechanismScale

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this review is crucial for modernizing safety standards in low-altitude airspace, which is increasingly used by diverse aircraft. They emphasize the importance of addressing emerging hazards like temporary obstructions and improving data dissemination to prevent accidents, particularly for critical operations like air medical transport and agricultural spraying, ensuring that regulations keep pace with evolving airspace uses.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against a review mandate, as it is generally seen as a proactive safety measure. Potential concerns, if any, might revolve around the scope or timeline, or the administrative burden on the FAA, but these are usually secondary to the safety objective.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the imperative for enhanced safety in low-altitude airspace with the administrative effort required from the FAA and other agencies, and the potential for new compliance requirements for non-aviation communities.

Section 2(b)

Updated Regulations, Guidance, and Policies for Temporary Obstructions

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the FAA Administrator, if the review mandated in subsection (a) determines that existing policies are inadequate for identifying requirements related to marking or lighting slacklines or other temporary obstructions, to update relevant FAA regulations, guidance, or policies. This update must occur within one year of the bill's enactment, ensuring that any identified deficiencies in current rules are promptly addressed through concrete regulatory action.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this