The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9764·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 16, 2026

HONOR Act

IntroducedTaxationMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 16, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to increase the tax burden on U.S. entities operating in or earning income from Russia, thereby reducing Russia's revenue from foreign investment and discouraging economic activity with the country.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny U.S. companies and individuals the ability to claim foreign tax credits for income taxes paid or accrued to the Russian Federation. This means that any taxes paid to Russia cannot be offset against U.S. tax liability, effectively subjecting income earned in Russia to double taxation for U.S. taxpayers. The denial applies for a specific period, beginning 30 days after the bill's enactment and lasting until normal trade relations with Russia are restored.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this measure is a critical tool to further isolate the Russian Federation economically and pressure its government. By denying foreign tax credits, the bill increases the cost of doing business in Russia for U.S. entities, reducing the financial benefits Russia derives from such activities and aligning U.S. tax policy with broader foreign policy goals of sanctioning Russia for its actions.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that this measure could disproportionately harm U.S. companies and investors who still have legitimate operations or assets in Russia, potentially forcing them to incur significant financial losses or withdraw under unfavorable conditions. They might also contend that it could complicate international tax relations and potentially lead to retaliatory measures from Russia, further destabilizing global markets without achieving the desired foreign policy outcome.

The bill text is very short and can be read quickly, making it accessible for immediate evaluation.

Section 2(a), amending Section 901(j)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

Denial of Foreign Tax Credit for Russian Federation Taxes

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Internal Revenue Code to prevent U.S. taxpayers from claiming a credit for income taxes paid to the Russian Federation. This means that U.S. companies and individuals operating in Russia will not be able to reduce their U.S. tax liability by the amount of taxes they pay to the Russian government, effectively subjecting that income to taxation by both countries. The denial takes effect 30 days after the bill's enactment and continues until the U.S. restores normal trade relations with Russia.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. corporations and individuals with income taxable by the Russian FederationImpactIncreased tax burdenMechanismInability to offset Russian taxes against U.S. tax liabilityScalePotentially significant for entities with substantial Russian income
GroupRussian Federation governmentImpactReduced revenue from U.S. entities, decreased foreign investmentMechanismU.S. entities less willing to pay Russian taxes if not creditableScalePotentially significant, depending on the volume of U.S. business in Russia

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly targets Russia's financial resources by making it more expensive for U.S. entities to operate there, thereby reducing the economic benefits Russia gains from foreign investment and trade. It aligns U.S. tax policy with broader sanctions efforts.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that this provision could primarily harm U.S. businesses and investors who are already navigating complex geopolitical challenges, rather than significantly impacting the Russian government. It could also lead to U.S. companies divesting from Russia at a loss, potentially allowing Russian or other foreign entities to acquire assets cheaply.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the foreign policy goal of pressuring Russia with potential financial burdens on U.S. businesses and the complexities of international tax law.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this