The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9826·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 22, 2026

Glenwood Hot Springs Protection Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Hurd, Jeff [R-CO-3]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 22, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to permanently halt the expansion of a limestone quarry on federal land near Glenwood Springs, Colorado, to protect local natural resources and the environment.

What it actually does

This bill, titled the 'Glenwood Hot Springs Protection Act,' prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from approving any applications for the expansion of existing mineral operations, including mining or mill site claims, or mineral material sales contracts, for limestone on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land within a specifically defined area in Garfield County, Colorado. This effectively prevents the expansion of the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry near Glenwood Springs.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for protecting the natural beauty, environmental integrity, and economic vitality of the Glenwood Springs area, particularly the iconic hot springs. They contend that quarry expansion poses risks to water quality, air quality, wildlife habitats, and the tourism industry that relies on the region's pristine environment. Proponents believe that the long-term benefits of conservation outweigh the short-term economic gains from quarry expansion.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that this bill represents an undue federal intervention in local economic activity and private property rights, potentially leading to job losses and reduced availability of essential construction materials. They may assert that existing environmental regulations are sufficient to manage quarry operations responsibly and that prohibiting expansion limits economic growth and resource development in the region. Critics could also argue that the bill sets a problematic precedent for federal restrictions on mineral extraction on public lands.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing for a quick and easy understanding of its core purpose.

Section 2

Prohibition on Expansion of Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section explicitly forbids the Secretary of the Interior from taking any action to approve the expansion of existing limestone mineral operations on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land within a specified geographic area in Garfield County, Colorado. This prohibition applies to various types of mineral claims and contracts, including those under general mining laws and the Materials Act of 1947 and Surface Resources Act of 1955. The intent is to prevent any further growth of the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMid-Continent Limestone Quarry operatorImpactNegative impact on business operations and future growth potential.MechanismDirect prohibition on expansion applications.ScaleHigh, directly impacts core business strategy.
GroupResidents of Glenwood Springs and surrounding areasImpactPositive impact on environmental quality and preservation of natural resources.MechanismPrevention of increased dust, noise, traffic, and potential environmental degradation associated with quarry expansion.ScaleMedium to high, affecting quality of life and local environment.
GroupTourism industry in Glenwood SpringsImpactPositive impact by preserving the natural appeal of the area.MechanismProtection of scenic views, air quality, and the reputation of Glenwood Springs as a natural destination.ScaleMedium, supporting a key local industry.
GroupConstruction and industrial sectors reliant on limestoneImpactPotential negative impact due to restricted supply or increased costs if alternative sources are more expensive.MechanismLimitation on the availability of limestone from this specific quarry.ScaleLow to medium, depending on the availability of other sources.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is essential to safeguard the unique natural environment and the economic well-being of Glenwood Springs, which heavily relies on tourism and its natural hot springs. They believe that preventing quarry expansion is a necessary step to protect air and water quality, preserve scenic vistas, and maintain the area's appeal for residents and visitors alike.

Critics contend

Critics contend that this prohibition infringes upon the rights of the quarry operator and could lead to economic hardship, including job losses. They may argue that the quarry provides valuable resources for construction and other industries, and that a blanket prohibition on expansion is an overreach that disregards the economic contributions and potential for responsible resource extraction.

Tradeoffs

This provision highlights the tension between economic development through resource extraction and environmental conservation for tourism and quality of life. It forces a choice between allowing industrial expansion that provides materials and jobs, and protecting a specific natural landscape and its associated economic benefits (tourism) and community values.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this