The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9961·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 27, 2026

No Campaign Funded Cover-Ups Act

IntroducedCongressMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17]
Committees
Committee on House Administration (primary)
Last action
Jul 27, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to prevent the use of political funds for personal legal liabilities stemming from sexual misconduct claims, enhancing transparency and accountability for federal officeholders and candidates.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits federal candidates and officeholders from using campaign contributions or legal expense funds to pay legal fees, settlements, judgments, or costs for private investigators and opposition research related to claims of sexual assault, sexual abuse, or sexual harassment. It also mandates new, detailed reporting requirements for legal expenses disbursed by authorized committees, and applies these prohibitions retroactively to payments made within two years prior to enactment.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill increases accountability for public officials, prevents the misuse of donor funds for personal misconduct, and promotes transparency in legal expenditures related to serious allegations. It ensures that individuals, not their political donors, bear the financial responsibility for such claims, fostering greater public trust in government ethics.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that restricting the use of legal defense funds could disproportionately impact candidates or officeholders facing politically motivated or false accusations, potentially hindering their ability to mount a robust defense. Some might also raise concerns about the fairness and legality of the retroactive application, as it penalizes actions that were legal at the time they occurred.

The bill is concise and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick but thorough review by an informed reader.

Section 2(a)

Prohibition on Payment of Legal Fees for Sexual Misconduct Claims

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision forbids federal candidates and officeholders from using money from their legal expense funds or campaign committees to pay legal fees incurred while defending against claims of sexual assault, sexual abuse, or sexual harassment. However, if the individual is subsequently held not liable for such a claim, they are permitted to be reimbursed for these legal fees from the fund or committee.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal candidates and officeholdersImpactFinancial restriction on legal defense fundingMechanismDirect prohibition on fund use, with a conditional reimbursement clause.ScaleApplies to all federal candidates and officeholders.
GroupDonors to legal expense funds and campaign committeesImpactEnsures funds are not used for personal legal defense against sexual misconduct claims.MechanismRedefines permissible uses of contributions.ScaleAffects all donors to covered individuals.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this ensures personal accountability, preventing individuals from using funds intended for political activity or public service to cover personal legal liabilities for serious misconduct.

Critics contend

Critics might contend this could financially cripple individuals facing potentially false or politically motivated accusations, as legal defense costs can be substantial, especially for high-profile cases, before a verdict of non-liability is reached.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the principle of personal accountability for misconduct against the potential burden on individuals to defend themselves against allegations, regardless of their veracity, by requiring personal funding upfront.

Section 2(b)

Prohibition on Payment of Settlements and Judgments for Sexual Misconduct Claims

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to explicitly state that using campaign contributions or legal expense funds to pay settlements or court-ordered judgments related to sexual assault, sexual abuse, or sexual harassment claims constitutes a 'personal use' of funds. This redefinition effectively bans such payments from these sources.

Section 2(c)

Prohibition on Payments for Private Investigators and Opposition Research Against Accusers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision further amends the Federal Election Campaign Act to classify the use of campaign contributions or legal expense funds as 'personal use' if they are spent on private investigators or opposition research aimed at discrediting individuals who have brought sexual assault, abuse, or harassment claims against the candidate or officeholder.

Section 2(d)

Retroactive Application of Prohibitions

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision stipulates that all prohibitions outlined in Section 2 (regarding legal fees, settlements, judgments, private investigators, and opposition research) will apply retroactively to any payment made within two years prior to the date the Act is enacted.

Section 3

Enhanced Reporting Requirements for Legal Expenses

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to add new reporting requirements for authorized committees. For any disbursement for a legal fee, service, or expense, committees must now report the recipient's name, date and amount, a brief description of the general nature and purpose of the legal matter, the specific purpose of the disbursement (e.g., representation, settlement, judgment), and the name of any person whose legal expenses were paid if different from the recipient.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this