The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9963·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 27, 2026

North Korean FAKER Act

IntroducedInternational AffairsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40]
Committees
Foreign Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 27, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to bolster international efforts and U.S. diplomatic tools to detect, disrupt, and deter North Korea's illicit financial activities that fuel its weapons of mass destruction programs.

What it actually does

This bill authorizes the Secretary of State to coordinate with U.S. allies and partners and engage with private sector entities to detect, attribute, and disrupt North Korea's illegal revenue generation through deceptive remote employment and identity fraud schemes. These illicit funds are used to support North Korea's ballistic missile, nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs. The bill also enhances the Rewards for Justice Program for information related to these activities and mandates annual reports to Congress.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is a crucial step to cut off funding for North Korea's dangerous weapons programs by targeting a specific, evolving revenue stream. They contend that it leverages essential international cooperation and private sector expertise, which are vital for tackling sophisticated cyber-enabled illicit activities that transcend national borders.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent to counter North Korea's illicit financing is valid, the bill's measures might not significantly impact deeply entrenched illicit networks. Some may also suggest that achieving true international alignment and effective private sector engagement could prove challenging, potentially limiting the bill's overall effectiveness without more robust enforcement mechanisms or specific funding allocations.

The bill is concise and can be read and understood quickly, making it accessible for evaluation by an informed reader.

Section 2

Statement of Policy

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section formally declares the United States' policy to combat North Korea's illegal revenue generation from deceptive remote employment and identity fraud schemes. It aims to prevent these funds from supporting North Korea's ballistic missile, nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs, and to promote international cooperation to detect, disrupt, and deter such activities.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. government agenciesImpactProvides guiding principles for U.S. foreign policy regarding North Korea's illicit activities.MechanismEstablishes the strategic framework for diplomatic and interagency efforts.ScaleBroad, foundational
GroupInternational allies and partnersImpactEncourages alignment of efforts and shared objectives in countering North Korean proliferation.MechanismSets a clear U.S. stance for diplomatic engagement.ScaleInternational

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a clear statement of policy is essential to guide diplomatic efforts and interagency coordination, signaling a strong commitment to countering North Korea's illicit financing of WMD programs.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against a policy statement, though some might argue it is largely symbolic without concrete actions or sufficient resources for implementation.

Tradeoffs

None directly in the policy statement itself, but it sets the stage for potential tensions in implementation as diplomatic priorities are balanced.

Section 3(a)

International Coordination and Counter-Evasion Measures

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision authorizes the Secretary of State to coordinate with allied and partner governments to align sanctions, enhance information-sharing regarding North Korean remote IT worker schemes and WMD proliferation networks, and prioritize diplomatic engagement with countries identified as hosting or enabling these activities. It also directs the development of coordinated strategies and security assistance guarantees to prevent North Korean sanctions evasion and proliferation financing.

Section 3(b)

Engagement with Private Sector and Emerging Technologies

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section authorizes the Secretary of State to engage with private sector entities, including cybersecurity firms, financial institutions, digital asset platforms, and online labor marketplaces. The goal is to enhance the ability of the U.S. and its partners to detect, attribute, and disrupt North Korean illicit activities, specifically addressing the use of artificial intelligence, synthetic identities, and other emerging technologies in furtherance of these schemes.

Section 3(c)

Rewards for Justice Program Enhancement

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision authorizes the Secretary of State to increase rewards offered through the Rewards for Justice Program for information related to North Korea's illegal remote IT worker schemes and WMD proliferation networks. It also allows for enhanced outreach and public awareness campaigns to prioritize information that helps identify, disrupt, or prevent these activities.

Section 4

Annual Report on Illegal Remote Workforce Activities

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of State to submit an annual report to appropriate congressional committees for two years, starting 180 days after the bill's enactment. The report must assess North Korea's illegal remote workforce activities, describe coordination efforts with allies, detail actions taken to disrupt networks, outline interagency coordination, and recommend additional diplomatic, economic, or legislative measures.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this