The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9998·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 30, 2026

Wildfire Research Coordination Act of 2026

IntroducedEmergency ManagementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Pettersen, Brittany [D-CO-7]
Committees
Science, Space, and Technology Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 30, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to enhance interagency coordination on wildfire research and technology by formalizing collaboration between defense and civilian agencies.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of Defense to establish a joint memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior within 180 days of enactment. The MOU's purpose is to identify shared research and technology priorities related to fire science, including mitigation, ecological resilience, fire and smoke modeling, response, and post-fire recovery. It also mandates coordination between the Department of Defense's Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) and Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) and the Joint Fire Science Program of the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that formalizing interagency coordination through an MOU will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of federal fire science research. They contend that leveraging the expertise and resources of the Department of Defense alongside civilian agencies will lead to better strategies for wildfire mitigation, response, and recovery, ultimately protecting communities and critical infrastructure, including military installations, from the increasing threat of wildfires.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that such an MOU could create unnecessary bureaucracy, suggesting that existing informal coordination mechanisms might already be sufficient or that adding another layer of formal agreement may not lead to substantive improvements. Concerns could also be raised about potential mission creep for the Department of Defense into areas traditionally managed by civilian agencies, or that the MOU might become a symbolic gesture without significant impact on actual research outcomes or resource allocation.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

Interagency Memorandum of Understanding for Fire Science Coordination

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Defense to enter into a joint agreement (MOU) with the Secretary of Agriculture (specifically the Chief of the Forest Service) and the Secretary of Interior within 180 days of the bill becoming law. The MOU's primary goals are to identify common research and technology priorities in fire science, such as how to prevent, manage, and recover from wildfires, and to ensure that relevant programs within these agencies coordinate their research efforts on these shared priorities.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of DefenseImpactIncreased coordination and formalization of fire science research efforts, potential for resource sharing and strategic alignment.MechanismMandate to enter into an MOU and direct research coordination.ScaleFederal agency level
GroupDepartment of Agriculture (Forest Service)ImpactEnhanced collaboration on fire science research, potential for leveraging DoD resources and expertise.MechanismParticipation in a joint MOU and coordination of research programs.ScaleFederal agency level
GroupDepartment of the InteriorImpactEnhanced collaboration on fire science research, potential for leveraging DoD resources and expertise.MechanismParticipation in a joint MOU and coordination of research programs.ScaleFederal agency level
GroupWildfire researchers and scientific communityImpactPotential for more integrated and focused research priorities, improved funding opportunities for aligned projects.MechanismIdentification of joint priorities and directed research coordination.ScaleNational research community

Supporters argue

Proponents argue this provision is crucial for streamlining federal efforts in fire science. By aligning the research priorities of DoD with those of USDA and DOI, it ensures that resources are used more effectively, preventing duplication and fostering innovation in critical areas like fire modeling and ecological resilience. This coordinated approach is seen as essential for addressing the growing complexity and scale of wildfires.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that while coordination is good, a formal MOU might introduce bureaucratic hurdles that slow down research rather than accelerate it. They could argue that agencies already collaborate informally and that a mandated agreement might not add significant value beyond existing practices, potentially diverting administrative resources from actual research.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the desire for formal, structured interagency cooperation against the risk of creating additional administrative overhead. It seeks to ensure strategic alignment of research efforts but requires careful implementation to avoid stifling agile, responsive research initiatives within individual agencies.

Section 2(b)

Report to Congress on MOU Implementation

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees within one year after the bill's enactment. This report must detail the specific actions taken by the Secretary of Defense to establish and implement the interagency memorandum of understanding as outlined in subsection (a).

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this