The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9999·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 30, 2026

Mountain Pine Beetle Coordination Act

IntroducedAgriculture and FoodSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Pettersen, Brittany [D-CO-7]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 10, 2026

Bottom line

The bill establishes a framework for federal agencies to partner with state and tribal entities to address widespread mountain pine beetle infestations and mitigate wildfire hazards.

What it actually does

This bill authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture, through the Forest Service, to enter into cooperative agreements with states, political subdivisions, and federally recognized Indian Tribes to combat mountain pine beetle infestations and reduce associated wildfire risks. It also directs the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) to provide technical assistance for monitoring and managing these infestations upon request from covered entities. The goal is to foster coordinated efforts in detection, treatment, mitigation, and hazard reduction.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill provides a crucial framework for coordinated action against the escalating threat of mountain pine beetle infestations, which devastate forests and significantly increase wildfire risk. They contend that a unified approach, combining federal resources and expertise with local knowledge and implementation, is essential for effective forest health management and protecting communities from catastrophic wildfires. The provision for technical assistance from APHIS is seen as a vital component for leveraging scientific expertise.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is good, the bill lacks specific funding mechanisms or appropriations, potentially making its authorized activities difficult to implement effectively without subsequent legislative action. Some may also contend that existing federal programs already provide similar avenues for cooperation, and this bill might create redundant bureaucratic layers without adding substantial new resources or capabilities. Others might raise concerns about the scope of federal involvement in local land management decisions.

The bill is very short and easy to read, making it accessible for any reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

Cooperative Agreement Authorization

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, to enter into cooperative agreements with states, political subdivisions, and federally recognized Indian Tribes. These agreements are intended to support activities like coordinated monitoring, data sharing, joint project planning, increasing processing capacity for beetle-killed trees, and reducing hazards in affected areas, all aimed at addressing mountain pine beetle infestations and reducing wildfire risk.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupStates, political subdivisions, and federally recognized Indian TribesImpactReceive federal support and partnershipMechanismThrough cooperative agreements for forest health and wildfire mitigation activitiesScalePotentially widespread across affected regions
GroupForest Service and other federal agenciesImpactIncreased coordination and workloadMechanismEngaging in cooperative agreements and providing resourcesScaleNational, particularly in Western states
GroupCommunities in forested areasImpactReduced wildfire risk and improved forest healthMechanismThrough coordinated mitigation efforts and hazard reductionScaleLocal to regional

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that formal cooperative agreements are essential for effective, cross-jurisdictional management of widespread ecological threats like mountain pine beetle infestations. They believe this provision will streamline collaboration, leverage diverse resources, and ensure a more comprehensive response to forest health crises and associated wildfire dangers.

Critics contend

Some critics might argue that while cooperation is valuable, this provision might not fundamentally change existing collaborative efforts, or that without dedicated funding, the authorization alone may not lead to significant new actions. Concerns could also be raised about the administrative burden of establishing and managing numerous new agreements.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need for federal leadership and resources with the importance of local and state autonomy in land management. It aims to achieve greater efficiency through coordination, but also introduces potential administrative overhead for establishing and managing these agreements.

Section 2(b)

Technical Assistance from APHIS

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section mandates that the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) provide technical assistance to covered entities (states, political subdivisions, and federally recognized Indian Tribes) upon their request. This assistance specifically relates to the monitoring and management of mountain pine beetle infestations, covering aspects such as detection, spread dynamics, and mitigation strategies.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this