The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 1016·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 13, 2025

Vicksburg National Military Park Boundary Modification Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 13, 2025

Bottom line

This bill transfers specific federal land within the Vicksburg National Military Park to the State of Mississippi for public use facilities, adjusting the park's boundary accordingly.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to convey two specific parcels of federal land, totaling approximately 10.14 acres, located within the Vicksburg National Military Park to the State of Mississippi without monetary consideration. The State is intended to use these parcels for public facilities such as a welcome center, interpretive center, or museum. Upon conveyance, the official boundary of the Vicksburg National Military Park will be modified to exclude these transferred lands.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill streamlines the management of the Vicksburg National Military Park by transferring specific parcels to the State for public-facing facilities. This can enhance visitor experience and local tourism without incurring federal operational costs for these particular sites, potentially allowing for more efficient development and management of visitor services by the State.

Opponents contend

No organized opposition is immediately apparent for a bill of this nature, as it involves a land transfer for public use facilities. Potential concerns, if any, might revolve around the precedent of transferring National Park Service land, ensuring the State's intended use aligns with historical preservation goals, or the lack of monetary consideration for federal land.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(a) and 2(b)

Federal Land Conveyance to Mississippi and Park Boundary Adjustment

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates the Secretary of the Interior to transfer two specific parcels of land, totaling about 10.14 acres, from the Vicksburg National Military Park to the State of Mississippi. The first parcel (3.66 acres) is designated for a welcome center or other public use, and the second (6.48 acres) for an interpretive center, museum, or other public use. The transfer is made "without consideration," meaning the State receives the land free of charge. Following the conveyance, the official boundary of the Vicksburg National Military Park will be updated to reflect the exclusion of these parcels.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState of MississippiImpactGains ownership of federal land for public use facilities.MechanismDirect conveyance from the Secretary of the Interior without monetary consideration.ScaleApproximately 10.14 acres of land.
GroupVicksburg National Military ParkImpactBoundary modified, reduces federal land management responsibility for these specific parcels.MechanismOfficial boundary adjustment following conveyance.ScaleMinor reduction in overall park acreage.
GroupVisitors to Vicksburg National Military ParkImpactPotential for enhanced visitor services and interpretive facilities managed by the State.MechanismState development of welcome/interpretive centers.ScaleLocalized improvement in visitor experience.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that transferring these specific parcels to the State allows for more efficient development and operation of visitor services like welcome and interpretive centers, potentially enhancing the overall visitor experience at the park while aligning with local and state priorities for historical interpretation and tourism.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision, as it facilitates public use facilities and is a minor boundary adjustment. Concerns, if any, might be general about the disposition of federal land without monetary compensation or ensuring the State's use remains consistent with the park's mission.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff involves balancing federal control over National Park Service land with the potential benefits of state-managed visitor facilities. While the federal government relinquishes direct control over these parcels, the State is expected to develop facilities that support the park's mission and enhance public access, potentially leading to a more integrated visitor experience.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this