The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 1147·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 26, 2025

Defining Male and Female Act of 2025

IntroducedCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 26, 2025

Bottom line

This bill codifies a strictly biological, immutable definition of sex into federal law, explicitly excluding gender identity as a legal replacement for sex, which would mandate a reevaluation of all federal policies and regulations.

What it actually does

This bill amends Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, to establish statutory definitions for "sex," "male," "female," and related terms (boy, girl, man, woman, father, mother) based on immutable biological classification at conception, specifically tied to reproductive function. Crucially, it explicitly states that "gender identity" shall not be recognized by the Federal Government as a replacement for sex, as it is deemed disconnected from biological reality.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill provides essential clarity and consistency in federal law, ensuring that legal distinctions based on sex align with objective biological reality. They contend this is vital for protecting the rights and opportunities of biological females in contexts such as sports, single-sex spaces, and accurate data collection, thereby preventing confusion and maintaining fairness.

Opponents contend

Opponents contend that this bill is discriminatory and harmful, effectively erasing the legal recognition and existence of transgender and intersex individuals under federal law. They argue it would codify definitions that undermine civil rights protections, create widespread confusion, and lead to legal challenges in areas where gender identity is currently recognized or accommodated.

The bill text is exceptionally short and straightforward, making it very accessible for a reader to understand its explicit provisions and proposed changes to federal law.

Section 2, adding 1 U.S.C. 9(3)

Definition of 'Female' based on biological reproductive function

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision defines "female," when referring to a natural person, as a person belonging, at conception, to the sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing eggs (ova). This establishes a specific, immutable biological definition of female for all federal law and regulations.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupBiological femalesImpactLegal recognition and protection based on biological sex would be explicitly codified, potentially reinforcing sex-segregated spaces and programs.MechanismCodifies a specific biological definition into federal law.ScaleBroad, affecting all federal laws and regulations.
GroupTransgender womenImpactExcludes them from the legal definition of "female" in federal law, potentially impacting access to female-specific programs, spaces, or protections.MechanismExplicit biological definition.ScaleBroad, affecting all federal laws and regulations.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this definition provides clear, objective criteria for identifying females, which is essential for maintaining fairness in women's sports, ensuring accurate health data, and protecting spaces designated for biological women.

Critics contend

Opponents contend this definition is exclusionary and harmful to transgender women, denying their lived identity and potentially stripping them of protections or access to services intended for women, thereby undermining their civil rights.

Tradeoffs

The bill seeks to balance the desire for biological clarity in law with concerns about the inclusion and recognition of transgender individuals and their self-identified gender.

Section 2, adding 1 U.S.C. 9(6)

Definition of 'Male' based on biological reproductive function

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision defines "male," when referring to a natural person, as a person belonging, at conception, to the biological sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing sperm. This establishes a specific, immutable biological definition of male for all federal law and regulations.

Section 2, adding 1 U.S.C. 9(9)

Definition of 'Sex' as immutable biological classification

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision defines "sex," when referring to a natural person's individual's sex, as the person's immutable biological classification as either male or female, as biologically determined and defined by this section. This reinforces the biological basis and immutability of sex in federal law, making it the overarching principle for all sex-based classifications.

Section 2, adding 1 U.S.C. 9(4)

Federal Non-recognition of 'Gender Identity' as a replacement for sex

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision defines "gender identity" as an internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex. Crucially, it states that because such an identity does not provide a meaningful basis for identification for purposes of Federal law, the term shall not be recognized by the Federal Government as a replacement for sex. This explicitly prohibits federal agencies from using gender identity in place of biological sex.

Section 2, adding 1 U.S.C. 9(1), (2), (5), (7), (8), (10)

Definitions of 'Boy,' 'Girl,' 'Man,' 'Woman,' 'Father,' and 'Mother'

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision defines "boy" as a minor human male, "girl" as a minor human female, "man" as an adult human male, "woman" as an adult human female, "father" as a male parent, and "mother" as a female parent. These definitions are consequential because they derive directly from the bill's core biological definitions of male and female, ensuring consistency across related terms in federal law.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this