The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
SubstantiveWhat changed in REPORTED TO SENATEcompared with INTRODUCED IN SENATE (Mar 27, 2025)
See full diff

A substantive modification was made to the payment limitation table for low-population units of general local government. v2 adjusts the specific per-person dollar amounts across all population tiers from 1,000 to 50,000, which will impact the calculation of Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT). The overall structure and purpose of the amendment to 31 U.S.C. 6903(c) remain consistent between versions.

S. 1175·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 27, 2025

Small County PILT Parity Act

Reported To SenatePublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 23, 2026

Bottom line

The Small County PILT Parity Act aims to increase federal PILT payments to smaller, rural counties by adjusting the formula to provide higher per capita payments for lower population tiers and expanding the applicability of the tiered payment schedule.

What it actually does

This bill amends section 6903(c) of title 31, United States Code, to revise the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program's population tiers and per capita payment limitations for units of general local government. It lowers the population threshold for the lowest tier from 4,999 to 999 and adjusts the per capita payment schedule for counties with populations between 1,000 and 50,000, generally increasing the per capita payment for populations of 5,000 and above, and explicitly applying a tiered structure to populations between 1,000 and 4,999.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill provides greater equity and financial stability for small, rural counties that host significant federal lands, which are exempt from local property taxes. They contend that the increased payments will help these communities fund essential services like public safety, education, and infrastructure, which are often strained by the presence of federal lands.

Opponents contend

Potential opponents might raise concerns about the increased federal outlays resulting from these adjustments without a clear offset or new revenue source, potentially contributing to the federal deficit. Some might also argue that the current PILT formula is adequate, or that any adjustments should be part of a broader reevaluation of federal land payments rather than piecemeal changes.

The bill is very short and easy to read, allowing ample time for a thorough review and understanding of its provisions.

Section 2(1) and 2(2)(A) of the bill, amending 31 U.S.C. 6903(c)(1) and (c)(2)

Adjustment of Population Thresholds and Expansion of Tiered Payment Structure

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision changes the population thresholds used to determine how federal Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) are calculated for local governments. Previously, a specific calculation applied to populations under 4,999, and a table applied to populations 5,000 and above. This bill shifts those thresholds, so the special calculation now applies only to populations under 999, and the new tiered payment table applies to all populations from 1,000 upwards. This effectively expands the explicit tiered payment structure to include more small counties.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupUnits of general local government (counties, boroughs, etc.) with populations between 1,000 and 4,999ImpactThese entities will now fall under the explicit tiered payment table, which is likely to result in increased federal PILT payments.MechanismDirect amendment to statutory population thresholds.ScaleAffects potentially thousands of small to medium-sized counties across the U.S.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this change provides greater clarity and a more equitable payment structure for small counties, ensuring they receive adequate federal support for services in areas with federal lands.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against structural adjustments that expand eligibility or clarify formulas, unless they lead to significant, unfunded cost increases.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the need for clear, consistent payment formulas with the administrative complexity of managing multiple tiers and ensuring adequate support for diverse local governments.

Section 2(2)(B) of the bill, amending 31 U.S.C. 6903(c)(2)

Updated Per Capita Payment Rates for PILT Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision replaces the existing table of per capita payment rates used in the PILT program with a new one. The new table provides updated dollar amounts per person for local governments based on their population size, ranging from 1,000 to 50,000. For counties with populations of 5,000 and above, the new rates are generally higher than the old rates, leading to increased federal payments. For populations between 1,000 and 4,999, these rates now explicitly apply, likely resulting in increased payments compared to previous calculations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this