The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 119·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 16, 2025

No Retaining Every Gun In a System That Restricts Your Rights Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 16, 2025

Bottom line

This bill aims to prevent the federal government from maintaining a centralized database of firearm ownership by requiring the destruction of existing records from defunct Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) and prohibiting future collection.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the destruction of all firearm transaction records that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has collected from discontinued firearms businesses. Furthermore, it amends existing law to prohibit the ATF from collecting such records from businesses that cease operations in the future, effectively preventing the federal government from maintaining a centralized database of these transactions.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill protects Second Amendment rights and individual privacy by preventing the federal government from creating a de facto national firearm registry. They contend that retaining these records constitutes an overreach of government power and could potentially be used for confiscation efforts, thus undermining constitutional liberties.

Opponents contend

Opponents would likely argue that these records are crucial for law enforcement investigations, particularly in tracing firearms used in crimes, and that their destruction would severely hinder efforts to combat gun violence. They might also assert that these records are a necessary tool for public safety, not a registry, and their elimination would compromise criminal investigations.

The bill text is extremely short and straightforward, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

Mandate to Destroy Existing ATF Firearm Transaction Records

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to destroy all firearm transaction records that have been delivered to the Attorney General by discontinued firearms businesses under existing law. This destruction must occur within 90 days of the bill's enactment, aiming to eliminate the federal government's current archive of these records.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal Government (ATF)ImpactRequired to destroy existing records, resulting in the loss of historical transaction data.MechanismStatutory mandate.ScaleAll existing records from discontinued Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs).
GroupLaw Enforcement AgenciesImpactLoss of a tool for tracing firearms used in crimes, particularly older firearms.MechanismRecords are no longer available for search or investigation.ScaleSignificant impact on investigations involving firearms sold by defunct FFLs.
GroupFirearm OwnersImpactEnhanced privacy and reduced risk of government tracking of past firearm transactions.MechanismPersonal transaction records are eliminated from federal databases.ScaleBroad, affects all individuals whose past transactions are contained in these records.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that these records constitute an illegal or unconstitutional de facto registry of firearm owners, and their destruction is essential to protect Second Amendment rights and privacy from potential government overreach.

Critics contend

Critics would contend that these records are vital for law enforcement to trace firearms used in crimes, solve cases, and prevent future violence, and their destruction would severely hamper public safety efforts.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances individual privacy and Second Amendment concerns against law enforcement's ability to investigate crimes involving firearms.

Section 2(b)

Prohibition on Future Federal Collection of Discontinued FFL Records

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends current law (18 U.S.C. 923(g)(4)) by striking the sentences that require Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) who discontinue business to deliver their transaction records to the Attorney General. This change prevents the federal government from collecting such records in the future, ensuring that new records from defunct businesses will not be added to federal databases.

Section 3

Report to Congress on Record Destruction

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to submit a written report to Congress. This report must specify the total number of firearm transaction records that were destroyed under Section 2(a) of the Act, providing an accountability mechanism for the mandated destruction.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this