The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 1191·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 27, 2025

Studying NEPA’s Impact on Projects Act

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 27, 2025

Bottom line

This bill mandates increased transparency and data collection regarding the implementation and impacts of NEPA, particularly concerning environmental reviews and related litigation.

What it actually does

This bill amends the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to require the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to publish an annual report. This report must detail litigation related to NEPA non-compliance, the length and cost of environmental impact statements (EIS) and environmental assessments (EA), timelines for completing EISs, and a list of categorical exclusions used by federal agencies. The information must be disaggregated by project type and covered sector, and underlying data must be made public.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will provide crucial data to understand the efficiency and effectiveness of NEPA processes, identify bottlenecks, and inform potential reforms. They believe that greater transparency on costs, timelines, and litigation outcomes will help streamline project approvals and reduce delays for critical infrastructure and energy projects, without weakening environmental protections.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that while data collection is generally positive, the specific metrics required could be used to unfairly criticize NEPA, potentially leading to pressure to weaken environmental review standards. They might also contend that the administrative burden and cost of compiling such detailed reports could divert resources from actual environmental protection efforts or slow down existing review processes.

The bill is concise and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick read and easy understanding of its provisions.

Section 2. (a) Amends Section 201 of NEPA.

Mandate for Annual CEQ Report on NEPA's Impact

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to publish an annual report, starting July 1, 2025. The report must be submitted to relevant Congressional committees and made publicly available on the CEQ website. It replaces the existing general reporting requirement for CEQ, focusing it specifically on NEPA's implementation and effects.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCouncil on Environmental Quality (CEQ)ImpactIncreased administrative burden and new, specific reporting responsibilities.MechanismDirect statutory mandate.ScaleSignificant, requiring ongoing data collection and analysis.
GroupCongressImpactReceives detailed annual reports to inform oversight and legislative decisions regarding NEPA.MechanismDirect submission of reports.ScaleModerate, provides new information.
GroupPublic, researchers, advocacy groupsImpactGains access to comprehensive data on NEPA implementation and litigation.MechanismPublic website publication of reports and underlying data.ScaleBroad, enhances transparency.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a dedicated annual report is essential for evidence-based policymaking, allowing Congress and the public to better understand NEPA's practical application and identify areas for improvement in environmental review processes.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that while transparency is generally positive, the specific focus and detail required could lead to an overly critical view of NEPA, potentially setting the stage for weakening environmental protections.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the desire for comprehensive data to inform policy and the potential for the data to be used to justify reforms that some view as detrimental to environmental protection.

Section 2. (b)(1)

Reporting on NEPA-Related Causes of Action

prominently featuredstraightforward

The annual report must include detailed information on all active causes of action (lawsuits) alleging non-compliance with NEPA during the covered year. This includes identifying the defendant agency, lead plaintiff, court, alleged basis for the lawsuit, and its status or outcome (e.g., whether the project was reversed, allowed to proceed, additional measures ordered, settlement reached, or if the plaintiff received an award).

Section 2. (b)(2) and (b)(3)

Reporting on Length, Cost, and Timelines of EIS/EAs

prominently featuredmoderately complex

The report must detail the average and median page counts of draft and final Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) and Environmental Assessments (EA), disaggregated by agency and subagency. It also requires reporting on the total cost to prepare these documents, including personnel, contractor, and other direct costs, and, if practicable, costs incurred by cooperating agencies and applicants. Furthermore, it mandates reporting on the timelines for completing EISs, tracking key milestones from application submission to notice to proceed, and describing trends in these metrics.

Section 2. (b)(5)

Comprehensive List of Agency Categorical Exclusions

prominently featuredstraightforward

The annual report must include a comprehensive list of all categorical exclusions (CEs) used by each federal agency in their NEPA implementing regulations. It also requires identifying the total number of CEs established, adopted, or revised by each agency during the covered year.

Section 2. (c) and (d)

Data Disaggregation by Sector and Public Availability

prominently featuredstraightforward

All information in the annual report must be disaggregated by project type and "covered sector" (e.g., aviation, broadband, energy, manufacturing, transportation). The bill lists 14 specific sectors and allows CEQ to determine others. Additionally, the CEQ must publish the underlying data used to prepare the report, along with citations for court proceedings, to ensure public access and verifiability.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this