The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 1349·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 8, 2025

Ruby Mountains Protection Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 12, 2026

Bottom line

The bill permanently protects significant natural areas in Nevada from future mineral extraction activities by withdrawing them from mineral leasing laws, prioritizing conservation over potential resource development.

What it actually does

This bill permanently withdraws approximately 309,272 acres of National Forest System land in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and approximately 39,926.10 acres of National Wildlife Refuge System land in Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, both in Nevada, from all forms of operation under the mineral leasing laws. It also ensures that any future acquired lands within these boundaries will be similarly withdrawn.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is crucial for protecting the ecologically sensitive Ruby Mountains and Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, preserving their natural beauty, supporting outdoor recreation, and safeguarding vital water resources for local communities and wildlife. They emphasize the importance of these lands for conservation and sustainable economic activities like tourism.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that withdrawing these lands restricts access to potential domestic mineral resources, which could be vital for national security or economic development. They may contend that it limits economic opportunities in the region and could increase reliance on foreign mineral imports.

This bill is very short and its core provisions are easily understood, making it highly accessible to any reader.

Section 2(a)

Withdrawal of Ruby Mountains National Forest System Land

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section permanently removes approximately 309,272 acres of federal land within the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest from eligibility for mineral leasing. This means no new oil, gas, or other mineral leases can be issued on these lands, effectively protecting them from future extraction activities.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMining and energy companiesImpactRestricted access to potential mineral resourcesMechanismLegal prohibition on new mineral leasesScaleSignificant acreage (309,272 acres)
GroupEnvironmental conservation groupsImpactEnhanced protection of natural habitats and ecosystemsMechanismLegal withdrawal from mineral leasingScaleSignificant ecological benefit
GroupOutdoor recreationists and local tourism industryImpactPreservation of scenic beauty and recreational opportunitiesMechanismPrevention of industrial developmentScalePositive for local economies reliant on tourism

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this withdrawal is crucial for preserving the pristine environment, biodiversity, and recreational value of the Ruby Mountains, which are vital for Nevada's natural heritage and economy.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that this withdrawal unnecessarily locks up potential mineral resources, hindering domestic supply and economic growth, especially if critical minerals are present.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the economic potential of mineral extraction against the environmental and recreational value of the land.

Section 2(b)

Automatic Withdrawal of Future Acquired National Forest System Land

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This clause ensures that any land or interest in land within the specified boundary of the Ruby Mountains subdistrict that the United States acquires after the bill's enactment will automatically be subject to the same mineral leasing withdrawal. This prevents future acquisitions from becoming loopholes for mineral development.

Section 3(a)(1)

Withdrawal of Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge Land

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section withdraws approximately 39,926.10 acres of federal land within the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge from mineral leasing laws. This action is intended to protect the refuge's critical wildlife habitats and water resources from the impacts of mineral extraction.

Section 3(a)(2)

Exception for Refuge Management Activities

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This clause clarifies that the withdrawal of Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge land does not prevent the United States Fish and Wildlife Service from conducting noncommercial activities necessary for refuge management. This ensures that essential conservation work, such as habitat restoration or invasive species control, can continue without hindrance.

Section 3(b)

Automatic Withdrawal of Future Acquired National Wildlife Refuge Land

mentioned in summarystraightforward

Similar to the National Forest provision, this section mandates that any land or interest in land acquired by the United States within the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge boundary after the bill's enactment will automatically be withdrawn from mineral leasing laws. This ensures consistent protection for the refuge's expansion.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this