The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 137·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 16, 2025

FIND Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
Committees
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 16, 2025

Bottom line

The FIND Act aims to prevent federal funds from going to businesses that restrict or limit services to the firearm and ammunition industries based on criteria other than standard financial risk or legal compliance.

What it actually does

This bill, known as the FIND Act, prohibits federal executive agencies from contracting with companies that "discriminate" against the firearm or ammunition industries. It requires prime contractors to certify they do not have such discriminatory policies and will not adopt them. Furthermore, prime contractors are prohibited from awarding significant subcontracts (over 10% of the prime contract value) to entities that do not provide a similar certification. Violations by prime contractors would lead to contract termination and debarment proceedings.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill protects the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens by ensuring that financial institutions and other service providers cannot arbitrarily deny services to firearm and ammunition businesses. They contend that such discrimination is a form of "woke capitalism" that unfairly targets a legal industry, and that the federal government should not implicitly endorse such practices through its contracting power. They believe it promotes fair business practices and prevents politically motivated boycotts against legal industries.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that this bill infringes on the private sector's ability to make independent business decisions based on their own risk assessments, corporate values, or public relations strategies. They could contend that it forces companies to do business with entities they might otherwise choose to avoid, potentially exposing them to reputational or financial risks. Critics may also view it as an overreach of federal power into private commercial relationships, potentially creating a chilling effect on corporate social responsibility initiatives.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core intent and mechanisms within a few minutes.

Section 2(a), adding new 41 U.S.C. 4715(a)(1)

Federal Agencies Prohibited from Contracting with Discriminatory Entities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that all federal executive agencies must include a clause in their contracts for goods or services. This clause requires the prime contractor to certify that they do not have, and will not adopt, any policy or practice that discriminates against firearm entities or firearm trade associations. This ensures that companies doing direct business with the federal government adhere to the non-discrimination standard.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal executive agenciesImpactNew contracting requirementMechanismMandates inclusion of a specific certification clause in all procurement contracts.ScaleApplies to all federal procurement contracts for goods or services.
GroupPrime contractors seeking federal contractsImpactNew compliance burden and restriction on business practicesMechanismMust certify non-discrimination against firearm industry.ScaleAffects any entity wishing to contract with the federal government.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is essential to ensure that federal taxpayer dollars do not indirectly support or enable discrimination against a constitutionally protected industry. They believe it levels the playing field for firearm businesses and prevents politically motivated financial boycotts.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue this provision interferes with the free market and private companies' rights to choose their business partners based on their own risk assessments or corporate values. They may contend it could force companies to engage in business relationships they deem undesirable.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the federal government's desire to prevent discrimination against a specific industry with the principle of corporate autonomy in business decisions. It also raises questions about the extent to which the government should dictate the business practices of its contractors beyond direct performance requirements.

Section 2(a), adding new 41 U.S.C. 4715(a)(2)

Prime Contractors Responsible for Subcontractor Non-Discrimination

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section extends the non-discrimination requirement down the supply chain. Prime contractors are prohibited from awarding first-tier subcontracts exceeding 10% of the prime contract's value to entities that do not also certify their non-discrimination against the firearm industry. It also prevents prime contractors from structuring subcontracts to bypass this 10% threshold.

Section 2(a), adding new 41 U.S.C. 4715(a)(3)

Contract Termination and Debarment for Non-Compliance

prominently featuredstraightforward

If a prime contractor violates the non-discrimination clause, the contract will be terminated for default. Furthermore, a suspension or debarment proceeding will be initiated against that contractor, potentially preventing them from securing future federal contracts for a specified period.

Section 2(a), adding new 41 U.S.C. 4715(c)(1)

Detailed Definition of Prohibited Discrimination

mentioned in summaryhighly complex

This section provides a precise definition of what constitutes "discrimination" against firearm entities or trade associations. It specifies that discrimination involves making judgments based on partial or category-based assessments rather than empirical data or case-by-case analysis; refusing services based on criteria other than credit history, financial risk, or legal non-compliance; or limiting operations in ways not required by law. Crucially, it clarifies that non-discriminatory criteria must be free from favoritism or prejudice against the firearm industry.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this