The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 1500·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 28, 2025

Access to Breast Cancer Diagnosis Act of 2025

IntroducedHealthMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]
Committees
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 28, 2025

Bottom line

This bill aims to eliminate out-of-pocket costs for medically necessary breast cancer diagnostic and supplemental imaging, potentially increasing access and reducing financial barriers for individuals.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Public Health Service Act to prohibit group health plans and health insurance issuers from imposing any cost-sharing requirements, such as deductibles, copayments, or coinsurance, for diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations. It defines these examinations based on medical necessity and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, and extends this prohibition to grandfathered health plans and creates a safe harbor for high-deductible health plans to ensure HSA eligibility is not affected.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill removes significant financial barriers to crucial breast cancer diagnostic services, ensuring that individuals, especially those with higher risk factors or suspicious findings, can access necessary follow-up care without facing unexpected costs. This could lead to earlier detection, better health outcomes, and reduced disparities in care by preventing delays in diagnosis due to financial concerns.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that mandating zero cost-sharing could increase premiums for all enrollees, shifting costs to other areas of healthcare or increasing the overall cost of health insurance. They might also raise concerns about potential overutilization of services if there are no financial deterrents, even with the allowance for prior authorization.

The bill is concise and can be read quickly, allowing ample time for evaluation of its implications.

Section 1

Short Title

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes the official short title of the Act as the "Access to Breast Cancer Diagnosis Act of 2025," which is how the bill will be commonly referred to if enacted. This provides a clear and concise name for the legislation, aiding in public understanding and legislative tracking.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral public, policymakersImpactProvides a clear, concise name for the legislation.MechanismScale

Supporters argue

A clear short title helps with public understanding and legislative tracking of the bill's purpose, making it easier for stakeholders and the public to refer to and discuss the legislation.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against short title provisions, as they are standard legislative practice.

Tradeoffs

None apparent for a short title.

Section 2(a), adding new section 2730(a) to the Public Health Service Act.

Prohibition on Cost-Sharing for Breast Examinations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This core provision mandates that group health plans and health insurance issuers cannot impose deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, or similar out-of-pocket expenses for diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations if they already cover these benefits. This means patients would not pay anything directly for these specific services, aiming to remove financial barriers to necessary care.

Section 2(a), adding new section 2730(b) and (c) to the Public Health Service Act.

Clarifications and Definitions for Breast Examinations

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This part clarifies that health plans can still require prior authorization or other utilization controls for these examinations, and that state laws offering greater protections are not superseded. It defines "cost-sharing requirements" to include deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, and similar out-of-pocket expenses. Crucially, it defines "diagnostic breast examination" and "supplemental breast examination" based on medical necessity and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, specifying types like mammography, MRI, and ultrasound.

Section 2(b), amending Section 1251(a)(4)(A) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Inclusion of Grandfathered Plans

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section extends the new cost-sharing prohibition for diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations to "grandfathered" health plans. These are plans that existed before the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and are generally exempt from many ACA requirements, but this amendment specifically brings them under the purview of the new no-cost-sharing rule for these breast examinations.

Section 2(c), amending Section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Safe Harbor for HDHPs and HSAs

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section creates a "safe harbor" for high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) starting January 1, 2026. It specifies that an HDHP will not lose its status (and thus its enrollees' eligibility for Health Savings Accounts, HSAs) simply because it covers diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations without a deductible. This is important because HDHPs typically require a high deductible to be met before most services are covered.

FOUND

Section 2(b) extends the no-cost-sharing requirement to grandfathered health plans, which are typically exempt from many ACA mandates. Section 2(c) creates a safe harbor for high-deductible health plans (HDHPs), allowing them to cover these examinations without a deductible while maintaining HSA eligibility.

Section 2(b) and 2(c)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for amending existing complex legal frameworks like the ACA and IRS Code. It ensures the new policy integrates correctly with existing law.

Case for: Supporters argue these provisions are essential to ensure the new no-cost-sharing benefit is broadly applicable across different types of health plans, preventing gaps in coverage and ensuring fairness for all insured individuals, including those in grandfathered plans or HDHPs.

Case against: Critics might argue that these amendments incrementally chip away at the distinct regulatory categories of grandfathered plans and HDHPs, potentially leading to increased complexity or unintended consequences for these specific plan types.

Estimated impact: These provisions significantly broaden the reach of the no-cost-sharing mandate, affecting millions of individuals enrolled in grandfathered plans or HDHPs, and impacting the design and administration of these plans by insurers.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this