The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in ENGROSSED IN SENATEcompared with INTRODUCED IN SENATE (Apr 29, 2025)

Technical corrections only. The engrossed version (v2) of the bill is identical in substantive content to the introduced version (v1). The differences are limited to administrative markings indicating passage by the Senate and standard engrossment formatting, with no changes to the legislative text.

S. 1510·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 29, 2025

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Reauthorization Act

Passed SenateCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]
Committees
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Dec 16, 2025

Bottom line

This bill extends the life and enhances the authority of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, aiming to significantly increase the public disclosure of historical civil rights cold case records.

What it actually does

This bill reauthorizes the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board for an additional four years, extending its tenure from 7 to 11 years. It strengthens the Board's powers by establishing a presumption of immediate disclosure for civil rights cold case records, allowing reimbursement for state and local government expenses in transmitting records, removing a previous exception for state/local governments regarding record transmission, and preventing the application of a specific FOIA privacy exemption to records created on or before January 1, 1990.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this reauthorization and strengthening of the Review Board are crucial for historical transparency, allowing the public to fully understand past civil rights injustices. They believe that greater access to these records can bring closure to victims' families and promote accountability, ensuring that critical historical information is not permanently withheld from public view.

Opponents contend

While direct opposition to the concept of transparency for civil rights cold cases is rare, potential concerns could revolve around the administrative burden and costs associated with digitizing and transmitting records for state and local governments, even with reimbursement. Some might also express concerns about privacy implications, particularly regarding the removal of the FOIA exemption for older records, though the bill specifically targets records created before 1990.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly and thoroughly.

Section 2(a)

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board Presumption of Release

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes a sense of Congress that all federal, state, and local government records concerning civil rights cold cases should carry a presumption of immediate disclosure and eventually be made public. This sets a guiding principle for the Review Board's operations, encouraging maximum transparency and public access to historical information.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupThe public, historians, victims' familiesImpactIncreased access to historical information and potential closure regarding civil rights cold cases.MechanismCongressional statement of intent guiding the Review Board's actions and encouraging maximum disclosure.ScaleBroad, affecting all civil rights cold case records.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision reinforces the commitment to transparency and ensures that the Review Board prioritizes public access to critical historical documents, fostering trust and understanding of past injustices.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against a general statement of congressional intent for transparency, though practical challenges in implementing full disclosure might be cited.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the desire for full public disclosure with potential administrative burdens or privacy concerns, though its primary function is to establish a guiding principle for the Review Board.

Section 2(b)

Reimbursement for Expenses Incurred by State or Local Governments

prominently featuredstraightforward

This amendment allows the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board to fully reimburse state and local governments for any expenses incurred when digitizing, photocopying, or mailing civil rights cold case records. The purpose is to facilitate the transmission of these records to the Archivist for inclusion in the national collection, removing financial barriers for compliance.

Section 2(c)

Transmission to Collection of Civil Rights Cold Case Records in Possession of State or Local Government

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This amendment strikes a phrase from the original Act, clarifying that the general requirement for transmitting civil rights cold case records to the Archivist now explicitly applies to state and local governments. This removes a previous exception, ensuring these entities are fully included in the mandate to contribute records to the national collection.

Section 2(d)

No Application of Section 552(b)(6) to Civil Rights Cold Case Records on or Before January 1, 1990

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This amendment modifies the original Act to specify that the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption for 'personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy' (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6)) does not apply to civil rights cold case records created on or before January 1, 1990. This aims to prevent the withholding of older, potentially sensitive, records based on privacy concerns.

Section 3

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board Extension of Tenure

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the original Act to extend the tenure of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board from 7 years to 11 years. This provides the Board with an additional four years to complete its mandate of reviewing and facilitating the disclosure of civil rights cold case records, acknowledging the extensive nature of its work.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this