The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 167·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 21, 2025

Protect and Serve Act of 2025

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 21, 2025

Bottom line

The bill establishes a new federal crime with severe penalties for serious assaults on law enforcement officers, contingent on specific federal jurisdictional elements and Attorney General approval for prosecution.

What it actually does

This bill creates a new federal crime under Title 18, United States Code, specifically targeting individuals who knowingly assault a law enforcement officer causing serious bodily injury, or attempt to do so. It establishes enhanced penalties, including life imprisonment, if the offense results in death, kidnapping, or attempted killing. Federal jurisdiction is triggered by factors such as interstate travel, use of interstate commerce, or the victim being a federal officer, and federal prosecution requires certification from the Attorney General.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this legislation provides essential federal protection for law enforcement officers who face increasing dangers, ensuring that serious assaults against them are met with robust federal penalties, particularly in cases where state prosecution may be insufficient or unavailable. They contend it sends a strong message that violence against those who protect communities will not be tolerated and reinforces a commitment to officer safety.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that existing state laws are generally sufficient to prosecute assaults on law enforcement officers, and that creating a new federal crime could lead to an unnecessary over-federalization of local crimes, potentially duplicating efforts or creating inconsistencies in justice. Concerns could also be raised about the broadness of 'affecting interstate commerce' as a jurisdictional hook, potentially expanding federal reach too far.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 2(a), adding new Section 120(a) to Title 18, United States Code.

Creation of Federal Crime for Assaulting Law Enforcement Officers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision establishes a new federal crime for knowingly assaulting a law enforcement officer, causing serious bodily injury, or attempting such an assault. The base penalty is up to 10 years imprisonment and/or a fine. If the offense results in the death of the officer, includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, or an attempt to kill, the penalty increases significantly to any term of years or life imprisonment and/or a fine.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupLaw enforcement officers (federal, state, local)ImpactIncreased federal protection and potential for federal prosecution in cases of serious assault.MechanismCreation of a new federal criminal statute.ScaleApplies to all law enforcement officers under specified federal jurisdictional circumstances.
GroupIndividuals who assault law enforcement officersImpactSubject to new federal charges and potentially harsher penalties for serious assaults.MechanismDirect application of the new federal criminal statute.ScaleApplies to any individual committing such an offense under federal jurisdiction.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses the rising threats faced by law enforcement, providing a necessary federal backstop to ensure that severe attacks on officers are met with appropriate justice, especially when state systems may be perceived as inadequate or when federal interests are paramount. It aims to deter violence against those who protect communities.

Critics contend

Critics may argue that this provision duplicates existing state laws, which already criminalize assaults on officers, and could lead to an unnecessary expansion of federal power into areas traditionally handled by states. They might also raise concerns about potential for over-prosecution or disparate application of federal versus state charges.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire to provide strong protections for law enforcement with concerns about federal overreach into state criminal justice matters. It also navigates the tension between ensuring justice for victims and avoiding redundant legal frameworks.

Section 2(a), adding new Section 120(b) to Title 18, United States Code.

Federal Jurisdictional Circumstances

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section defines the specific conditions under which a federal prosecution for assaulting a law enforcement officer can occur. These circumstances include: the defendant or victim traveling across a state line or national border; the use of interstate or foreign commerce channels; the employment of a weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; the conduct interfering with or affecting interstate or foreign commerce; or the victim being a federal law enforcement officer.

Section 2(a), adding new Section 120(c) to Title 18, United States Code.

Attorney General Certification Requirement for Prosecution

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision mandates that no prosecution under this new federal crime can be undertaken by the United States without a written certification from the Attorney General or a designated official. Certification is granted under specific conditions: if the state lacks jurisdiction, if the state requests federal assumption, if state charges demonstrably failed to vindicate federal interests, or if federal prosecution is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice. The provision also clarifies that it does not limit federal investigative authority.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this