The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 171·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 21, 2025

A bill to remove the lesser prairie-chicken from the lists of threatened species and endangered species published pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, to amend that Act to exclude the lesser prairie-chicken from the authority of that Act, and for other purposes.

IntroducedAnimalsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 21, 2025

Bottom line

The bill permanently strips federal protections from the lesser prairie-chicken, preventing its future listing under the Endangered Species Act.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the immediate removal of the lesser prairie-chicken, including all its distinct population segments, from the federal lists of threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). Furthermore, it amends the ESA to permanently prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from ever again designating the lesser prairie-chicken as an endangered or threatened species.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the federal listing of the lesser prairie-chicken imposes undue regulatory burdens on landowners, farmers, ranchers, and energy producers in affected states, hindering economic development and private land use. They contend that state-led and voluntary conservation efforts are sufficient and more appropriate for managing the species, and that federal overreach through the ESA is detrimental to local economies.

Opponents contend

Opponents assert that delisting the lesser prairie-chicken ignores scientific evidence indicating the species remains imperiled and requires federal protection to prevent further decline or extinction. They argue that removing the species from the ESA and precluding future listings sets a dangerous precedent, undermining the scientific integrity and effectiveness of the Act as a critical tool for biodiversity conservation.

The bill text is exceptionally short and straightforward, allowing for a quick and easy understanding of its direct provisions.

Section 1(a)

Immediate Delisting of Lesser Prairie-Chicken

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly removes the lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus), including all its distinct population segments, from the lists of threatened and endangered species maintained under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. This means that all federal protections, recovery plans, and regulatory requirements associated with its listed status would immediately cease upon enactment.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupLesser prairie-chicken populationImpactLoss of federal protection and associated recovery efforts, potentially increasing vulnerability to habitat loss and population decline.MechanismDirect removal from the lists of threatened and endangered species.ScaleSpecies-wide across its range
GroupLandowners and industries (e.g., oil and gas, agriculture) in range statesImpactReduced regulatory burden and compliance costs, potentially facilitating economic development and land use activities.MechanismElimination of ESA-related permitting, mitigation, and land use restrictions.ScaleRegional economic impact
GroupEnvironmental conservation groups and scientistsImpactLoss of a key federal tool for species protection and advocacy, potentially shifting conservation efforts to state or private initiatives.MechanismRemoval of legal standing and federal mandates for conservation.ScaleNational impact on conservation strategy

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this delisting will alleviate significant economic pressure on industries and private landowners in the lesser prairie-chicken's habitat, allowing for greater flexibility in land management and resource development. They often contend that the species' population has stabilized or that local, voluntary conservation efforts are sufficient, rendering federal intervention unnecessary and overly burdensome.

Critics contend

Opponents contend that the delisting is premature and not based on sound scientific evidence, arguing that the lesser prairie-chicken remains vulnerable to habitat loss and climate change. They assert that removing federal protections will accelerate the species' decline and could lead to its extinction, undermining the core purpose of the Endangered Species Act.

Tradeoffs

This provision navigates the tension between economic development and species conservation. It trades immediate regulatory relief for industries and landowners against the long-term ecological security of a vulnerable species, potentially shifting the burden of conservation entirely to state and local entities.

Section 1(b)

Permanent Exclusion from Endangered Species Act Authority

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prevent the Secretary of the Interior from making any future determination that the lesser prairie-chicken is an endangered or threatened species. This means that even if scientific evidence later indicates a severe decline in the species' population, it could not be relisted under the ESA without further congressional action.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
Ask Ledger AI about this