The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 1895·119th Congress·Introduced May 22, 2025

Mental Health Excellence in Schools Act

IntroducedEducationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN]
Committees
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee (primary)
Last action
May 22, 2025

Bottom line

The bill creates a federal-institutional matching grant program to subsidize graduate education for school mental health professionals, with a focus on students from low-income backgrounds or specific institutions, to address workforce shortages.

What it actually does

This bill establishes the Mental Health Excellence in Schools Program, authorizing the Secretary of Education to enter into agreements with eligible graduate institutions. Under these agreements, institutions will cover a portion of a participating student's cost of attendance for graduate degrees in school-based mental health fields, with the Secretary providing equivalent matching contributions. The program aims to increase the recruitment and retention of school-based mental health service providers.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill addresses a critical shortage of mental health professionals in schools by making graduate education more affordable and accessible. By prioritizing students who received Pell Grants or attended minority-serving institutions, the program also promotes diversity and equity within the school-based mental health workforce, ensuring better support for diverse student populations.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while the goal of increasing mental health providers is laudable, this program represents an expansion of federal involvement in higher education funding, potentially creating an unfunded mandate on graduate institutions to provide matching funds. Some may also question if this specific mechanism is the most efficient or effective approach compared to alternative strategies for workforce development.

The bill is concise and clearly written, allowing for a quick and thorough understanding of its provisions within a short timeframe.

Section 2(a), (b), (c)

Mental Health Excellence in Schools Program Authorization

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the Secretary of Education to create the 'Mental Health Excellence in Schools Program.' Under this program, eligible graduate institutions can enter agreements with the Secretary to cover a portion of a participating student's cost of attendance for school-based mental health degrees. The Secretary will then provide equivalent matching contributions. Each agreement will specify the institution's contribution method, maximum amount per student, and the maximum number of students supported annually.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGraduate institutionsImpactOpportunity to receive federal matching funds for student aid programs.MechanismEntering into agreements with the Secretary of Education to provide matching contributions for student costs of attendance.ScalePotentially significant, depending on institutional capacity and student interest in the program.
GroupStudents pursuing school-based mental health degreesImpactReduced cost of attendance for graduate studies, making education more accessible.MechanismReceiving direct grants or scholarships from participating institutions, matched by federal funds.ScaleDirect financial benefit, potentially enabling more individuals to pursue these careers.

Supporters argue

Supporters contend this direct financial incentive is crucial for attracting and retaining individuals in high-demand school-based mental health fields, directly addressing critical workforce shortages.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that requiring institutional matching contributions could disproportionately benefit wealthier institutions with larger endowments, or place a financial burden on institutions with fewer resources, potentially limiting the program's reach.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances federal investment with institutional commitment, aiming to leverage existing educational infrastructure while ensuring shared responsibility for funding student aid.

Section 2(d), (e)

Student Prioritization and Federal Matching Contributions

mentioned in summarystraightforward

The bill mandates that participating graduate institutions prioritize students who, as undergraduates, received Federal Pell Grants or attended institutions listed in section 371(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (which includes historically Black colleges and universities, tribal colleges and universities, and other minority-serving institutions). The Secretary is authorized to provide a federal contribution of up to 50 percent of the cost of attendance, matching the eligible graduate institution's contribution.

Section 2(f), (g), (h), (i)

Program Oversight, Evaluation, and Funding

mentioned in summarystraightforward

Participating institutions are required to submit annual reports detailing student numbers, tuition coverage, Pell Grant recipient numbers, and graduation/employment rates. The Secretary must submit an interim report to Congress after two years and commission an independent national evaluation after four years, with findings reported to Congress. The bill authorizes appropriations of $20 million for fiscal year 2026, $30 million for fiscal year 2027, and $50 million for each of fiscal years 2028 through 2030, totaling $200 million over five years.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this