The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 193·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 22, 2025

Neighbors Not Enemies Act

IntroducedImmigrationMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 22, 2025

Bottom line

This bill seeks to eliminate a centuries-old law that grants the President broad powers to detain or deport non-citizens solely based on their nationality during wartime, aiming to prevent potential abuses of executive power and uphold civil liberties.

What it actually does

The Neighbors Not Enemies Act proposes to repeal Sections 4067 through 4070 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (50 U.S.C. 21-24), commonly known as the Alien Enemies Act. This repeal would eliminate the President's statutory authority to apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove non-citizens from countries with which the U.S. is at war, solely based on their nationality.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue the Alien Enemies Act is an outdated, xenophobic law that grants excessive and dangerous power to the executive branch, enabling discrimination and human rights abuses against non-citizens during times of conflict. They contend its repeal is crucial for protecting civil liberties, preventing historical injustices from recurring, and aligning U.S. law with modern human rights standards, ensuring due process for all individuals.

Opponents contend

Those who might argue against repeal could contend that the Alien Enemies Act, while rarely invoked, provides a necessary emergency tool for national security during declared wars. They might argue that it allows the President to address potential threats posed by individuals from hostile nations, and that its repeal could compromise the government's ability to protect the nation in extreme circumstances, especially concerning espionage or sabotage.

The bill text is extremely short and straightforward, requiring less than a minute to read, making it highly accessible for public review and evaluation.

Section 2

Repeal of Alien Enemies Act

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section explicitly repeals Sections 4067 through 4070 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, codified at 50 U.S.C. 21-24. These statutes, collectively known as the Alien Enemies Act, authorize the President to apprehend, detain, and deport non-citizens (referred to as 'alien enemies') who are natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of a country with which the United States is at war. The repeal removes this specific executive power.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNon-citizens (aliens) from countries with which the U.S. is at warImpactProtection from arbitrary detention and deportation based solely on nationality during wartime, enhancing civil liberties and due process.MechanismRemoval of statutory authority that permitted such actions.ScalePotentially millions of individuals, depending on future geopolitical conflicts and the nationalities involved.
GroupThe Executive Branch (President and federal agencies)ImpactReduction of broad, discretionary wartime powers concerning non-citizens.MechanismRepeal of specific statutory authority, requiring reliance on other legal frameworks.ScaleSignificant limitation on executive authority, particularly during declared wars.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that repealing this act is a vital step to prevent the recurrence of historical injustices, such as the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII, and to uphold fundamental civil liberties for all individuals residing in the U.S., regardless of their nationality during wartime. They believe it removes a dangerous tool for xenophobia and discrimination.

Critics contend

Those who might oppose repeal would argue that the act, while rarely used, serves as a critical emergency power for the President to safeguard national security during declared wars. They might contend that it allows for the swift removal or control of individuals who might pose a threat due to their allegiance to an enemy state, and its existence acts as a deterrent.

Tradeoffs

This provision navigates the tension between national security interests during wartime and the protection of civil liberties for non-citizens. It prioritizes individual rights and due process over broad executive discretion in times of conflict, potentially limiting a tool for rapid response in favor of greater legal protections.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this