The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 2038·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 11, 2025

Wildfire Coordination Act

IntroducedScience, Technology, CommunicationsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Gallego, Ruben [D-AZ]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 11, 2025

Bottom line

This bill creates a new permanent federal advisory board to enhance the translation of wildfire science into practical operational strategies and improve interagency coordination for wildfire management.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to establish a permanent Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board. The Board's primary functions are to coordinate the integration of wildfire research into federal operations, identify practical applications for research findings, prioritize research projects for implementation, foster collaboration among stakeholders, and disseminate information and best practices to improve wildfire management.

Proponents argue

Supporters would argue that establishing a dedicated and permanent board is crucial for bridging the gap between cutting-edge wildfire research and its practical application by federal agencies. They contend that better coordination and a formalized process for operationalizing science will lead to more effective wildfire prevention, response, and recovery efforts, ultimately saving lives, property, and natural resources.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that creating another federal advisory board introduces unnecessary bureaucracy and administrative costs without guaranteeing significant improvements over existing interagency coordination efforts. They might suggest that resources could be more effectively deployed directly into firefighting, prevention programs, or existing research initiatives rather than funding a new administrative entity.

The bill is very concise and can be easily read and understood within a few minutes, allowing ample time for evaluation.

Section 2(a) and 2(b)

Establishment and Mandate of the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Secretary of the Interior to establish a permanent advisory committee, the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board. The Board is tasked with coordinating the integration of wildfire research into federal operations, identifying practical applications for research, prioritizing projects for operationalization, facilitating the transition of research into practice, connecting researchers and operators, providing feedback on research outputs, and partnering with private sector and federally funded research centers. It also encourages the inclusion of diverse disciplines like public health and meteorological science in wildfire efforts and mandates the dissemination of information to stakeholders.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal agencies involved in wildfire management (e.g., Interior, Agriculture, FEMA)ImpactIncreased coordination, improved research application, potential for more effective wildfire strategies.MechanismParticipation in the Board, implementation of Board recommendations, sharing of research and operational data.ScaleSystemic improvement across federal wildfire efforts.
GroupWildfire researchers (academic, private sector, federally funded)ImpactEnhanced opportunities for research to be operationalized, clearer priorities for applied research.MechanismEngagement with the Board, feedback loops, potential partnerships.ScaleImproved relevance and impact of wildfire research.
GroupState, local, and Tribal governments; fire departments; private sector entities; public health experts; meteorological scientists; predictive modeling expertsImpactRepresentation on the Board, access to disseminated information, potential for improved local wildfire management practices.MechanismBoard membership, newsletters, online portals, webinars, workshops.ScaleLocal and regional improvements in wildfire preparedness and response.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a dedicated, permanent board is essential to overcome existing silos between wildfire research and the agencies responsible for on-the-ground operations. They contend that by formalizing coordination and prioritizing the operationalization of science, the Board will accelerate the adoption of innovative techniques and data-driven strategies, ultimately making federal wildfire responses more effective and efficient.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that while the goal of better coordination is laudable, creating a new permanent board is an overly bureaucratic solution. They may suggest that existing interagency working groups or task forces could achieve similar coordination without the overhead of a new entity, or that agencies already have mechanisms to integrate research, and this board might duplicate efforts or slow down decision-making.

Tradeoffs

The bill seeks to balance the need for comprehensive, interdisciplinary scientific input with the potential for increased administrative overhead. There's a tension between creating a robust, representative body and ensuring it remains agile and effective in translating research into urgent operational needs.

Section 2(c)

Composition and Governance of the Advisory Board

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision details the composition of the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board, specifying that it will include representatives from 18 federal agencies and up to 18 non-federal members appointed by the Secretary of the Interior. Non-federal members will represent state, local, and Tribal governments, fire departments, private sector entities, and various scientific experts. Members serve 2-year terms without compensation but receive travel expenses. The Chairperson rotates annually among the Secretaries of Interior, Agriculture, and Commerce, unless otherwise designated. The Board is authorized to appoint staff and procure temporary services.

Section 2(d) and 2(f)

Reporting Requirements and Funding Authorization

prominently featuredstraightforward

The Board is mandated to submit a report to relevant congressional committees within two years of the Act's enactment. This report must detail the Board's activities, progress in transitioning wildfire research into operations, identify barriers to this transition, and provide recommendations for future research priorities and operational needs. The bill authorizes $10,000,000 to be appropriated to carry out its provisions, remaining available until expended. Additionally, federal members can use existing agency funds not otherwise specified to support the Board's work.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this