The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
3 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in ENGROSSED IN SENATEcompared with REPORTED TO SENATE (Jan 30, 2026)

Technical and administrative changes only. The diff reflects the bill's progression from being reported with an amendment to being engrossed after passing the Senate, removing legislative markup and adding an attestation. There are no substantive policy changes between v2 and v3.

S. 2245·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 10, 2025

A bill to amend the Digital Coast Act to improve the acquisition, integration, and accessibility of data of the Digital Coast program and to extend the program.

Passed SenateScience, Technology, CommunicationsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]
Committees
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 3, 2026

Bottom line

The bill strengthens open data requirements, broadens the types of coastal data collected, streamlines training, and extends the Digital Coast program's authorization through 2030.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Digital Coast Act to enhance the accessibility of data by requiring it to be 'fully and freely available'. It expands the scope of data collected to explicitly include underground infrastructure and subsurface utilities. Additionally, it narrows the types of training the program can offer, limiting them to technical instruction on data and tools. Finally, the bill extends the authorization for the Digital Coast program for an additional five years, from 2025 to 2030.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill improves the utility and reach of the Digital Coast program by ensuring data is more accessible and comprehensive, particularly with the inclusion of critical underground infrastructure data. The reauthorization provides stability for a vital program supporting coastal resilience and management, while focusing training resources on technical application ensures efficiency.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while expanding data collection is beneficial, limiting training strictly to technical instruction could hinder broader understanding and effective application of the data, especially for non-technical users or those needing contextual policy insights. Concerns could also be raised about the ongoing costs of the program's extension and expanded data scope, particularly if not offset by savings from streamlined training.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for a quick and thorough review.

Section 1(1)

Enhancing Data Availability

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Digital Coast Act to require that data collected and managed under the program be not only 'readily accessible' but also 'fully and freely available'. This change aims to remove any potential barriers to accessing coastal data, ensuring it is openly available to the public, researchers, and local governments without restrictions or fees, thereby maximizing its utility for various applications.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupPublic and ResearchersImpactIncreased access to coastal dataMechanismLegal mandate for 'fully and freely available' dataScaleBroad
GroupLocal Governments and Coastal PlannersImpactImproved data resources for decision-makingMechanismEnhanced accessibility of foundational coastal dataScaleSignificant

Supporters argue

Proponents argue this change promotes transparency, fosters innovation, and ensures that publicly funded data serves the broadest possible public good. It aligns with modern open data principles and maximizes the return on investment in data collection.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against provisions that enhance data accessibility, as it is generally seen as beneficial. However, some might raise concerns about the practicalities or costs of ensuring all data meets this standard, especially if it involves proprietary data from partners.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for maximum data utility with potential administrative challenges or costs associated with ensuring all data is fully and freely available, particularly concerning data integration from diverse sources.

Section 1(2)(A)(i)

Expanding Data Scope to Include Underground Infrastructure

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This amendment expands the types of data the Digital Coast program is authorized to acquire and integrate. Specifically, it adds 'data related to underground infrastructure and subsurface utilities' to the existing list of data types. This means the program will now explicitly focus on collecting information about buried pipelines, cables, and other utility systems, providing a more comprehensive understanding of coastal environments both above and below ground.

Section 1(2)(C)

Limiting Training Scope

buried in fine printstraightforward

This new provision specifies that any training provided by the Digital Coast program must be limited to 'technical instruction in the use of data and tools provided under this section'. This means the program will focus its educational efforts strictly on how to operate its specific data platforms and tools, rather than offering broader educational content on coastal policy, science, or management principles.

Section 1(3)

Program Reauthorization Extension

prominently featuredstraightforward

This amendment extends the authorization for the Digital Coast program by five years, changing the expiration date from 2025 to 2030. This ensures the program has continued legal authority to operate and receive appropriations for its activities in collecting, integrating, and making accessible coastal data for an extended period.

FOUND

Adds a new paragraph (5) to subsection (d) of the Digital Coast Act, stating that the program shall 'limit trainings to technical instruction in the use of data and tools provided under this section.'

Section 1(2)(C)

Why it matters:This is likely standard legislative practice for modifying specific operational details within an existing statutory framework, rather than an attempt to obscure. However, its impact on the program's outreach and user support strategy is significant.

Case for: Proponents argue this ensures the Digital Coast program maintains a focused mission, dedicating resources primarily to its core function of providing data and tools. It prevents mission creep and ensures efficiency by specializing in technical instruction.

Case against: Critics might argue that by strictly limiting training to technical instruction, the program may inadvertently reduce the effectiveness of its data for users who require broader contextual understanding or guidance on how to apply the data to complex policy or scientific questions.

Estimated impact: This provision could lead to a shift in the program's educational outreach strategy, potentially reducing the scope of non-technical support provided to stakeholders and focusing resources more narrowly on technical skill-building.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this