The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 2269·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 14, 2025

PRICE Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 14, 2025

Bottom line

The PRICE Act doubles the criminal penalties for individuals who assault, resist, or impede officers or employees of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

What it actually does

This bill amends title 18, United States Code, Section 111, which pertains to assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees. Specifically, it introduces a new subsection (c) that doubles the maximum term of imprisonment and adjusts the maximum fine for violations committed against an officer or employee of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill provides enhanced protection for ICE officers and employees, who often face dangerous situations in the course of their duties. They contend that increasing penalties will serve as a stronger deterrent against assaults, ensuring that those who target federal law enforcement officers, particularly those involved in critical immigration enforcement, face appropriately severe consequences. This measure is seen as a way to show respect and support for the challenging work performed by ICE personnel.

Opponents contend

Opponents may argue that existing federal law already provides substantial penalties for assaulting federal officers, and that creating agency-specific enhancements could lead to sentencing disparities without clear justification. They might contend that the current penalties under 18 U.S.C. 111 (up to 8 years, or 20 years if a deadly weapon is used or bodily injury results) are already sufficient to deter and punish such offenses, and that singling out one agency for doubled penalties could be perceived as politically motivated rather than based on a demonstrated need for additional deterrence.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2

Enhanced Penalties for Assaulting ICE Officers or Employees

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 111 of title 18, United States Code, which outlines penalties for assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers. It adds a new subsection (c) specifically for violations committed against officers or employees of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). For such violations, the maximum term of imprisonment that can be imposed will be doubled, and the corresponding maximum fine will be adjusted proportionally.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals who assault, resist, or impede federal officersImpactIncreased criminal penalties if the victim is an ICE officer or employeeMechanismDoubling of maximum imprisonment term and adjustment of maximum fine under 18 U.S.C. 111(a)ScaleIndividual offenders facing potentially longer sentences
GroupU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and employeesImpactEnhanced legal protections and deterrence against assaultsMechanismStricter penalties for those who commit crimes against themScaleIncreased sense of security and recognition for their work
GroupFederal judiciary and correctional systemsImpactPotential for longer sentences and increased incarceration costsMechanismJudges applying the doubled maximum terms, leading to longer prison staysScaleMarginal increase in federal correctional expenditures and caseloads

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that ICE officers face unique and often dangerous circumstances in their enforcement duties, making enhanced penalties a necessary deterrent and a recognition of the risks they undertake. Doubling the maximum sentence sends a strong message that assaults on these officers will be met with severe consequences, thereby improving officer safety and morale.

Critics contend

Critics may contend that existing federal law already provides robust protections for all federal officers, including ICE personnel, and that singling out one agency for enhanced penalties could create an uneven application of justice. They might argue that such specific enhancements could lead to disproportionate sentencing outcomes compared to assaults on officers from other federal agencies, without clear evidence that current penalties are insufficient for ICE.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire to provide specific, heightened protection for ICE officers against concerns about maintaining consistency in federal sentencing guidelines across different law enforcement agencies. There is a tension between the perceived need for stronger deterrence in a specific context and the potential for creating disparities in the application of criminal justice.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this