The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 2308·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 16, 2025

PATRIOT Parks Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Dec 9, 2025

Bottom line

The bill creates new revenue streams for national parks by imposing surcharges on international visitors, aiming to fund maintenance and services.

What it actually does

This bill, known as the PATRIOT Parks Act, authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to collect a new surcharge from international visitors to units of the National Park System that charge an entrance fee. It also mandates a surcharge on the sale of National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Passes to international visitors. Proceeds from the unit-specific surcharges would be retained by the collecting park for maintenance and services, while proceeds from the pass surcharge would go to the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that international visitors benefit from the U.S. National Park System and should contribute more directly to its upkeep and improvement. They contend that these surcharges will provide a dedicated, sustainable funding source to address maintenance backlogs, enhance visitor services, and support staffing, thereby reducing reliance on general taxpayer funds and ensuring the long-term preservation of these national treasures.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that imposing additional surcharges on international visitors could deter tourism, potentially harming local economies that rely on visitor spending. They may also contend that such fees could be perceived as unwelcoming or discriminatory, complicating international relations and potentially leading to reciprocal fees for U.S. travelers abroad. Concerns could also be raised about the administrative complexity of implementing and collecting these new fees.

The bill is short and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick read and evaluation.

Section 2(a)

Entrance Fee Surcharge for International Visitors

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to allow (or require, upon superintendent request) national parks that charge an entrance fee to add a surcharge specifically for international visitors. An 'international visitor' is defined as a nonimmigrant individual entering the U.S. under a B-1/B-2 visa or the Visa Waiver Program. Park superintendents would set the surcharge amount to maximize revenue while trying not to discourage international visits. For per-vehicle fees, the Secretary must establish a method to collect the surcharge proportionally. The collected funds would stay with the specific park unit to be used for maintenance, visitor services, and staffing.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupInternational visitors (B-1/B-2 visa holders, Visa Waiver Program participants)ImpactIncreased cost to visit National Park System units.MechanismDirect surcharge added to existing entrance fees.ScalePotentially all international visitors to fee-charging parks.
GroupNational Park System unitsImpactIncreased revenue for operational needs.MechanismDirect retention of surcharge proceeds.ScalePotentially significant for popular parks with high international visitation.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue this provision ensures that those who benefit from the parks, particularly international visitors, contribute directly to their upkeep. They believe it's a fair way to generate much-needed revenue for maintenance and services without burdening U.S. taxpayers, while also giving local park management flexibility to set appropriate fee levels.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that this surcharge could make U.S. national parks less attractive to international tourists, potentially leading to a decrease in overall visitation and associated economic activity in gateway communities. They may also argue that it adds an administrative burden to park staff and could be perceived as discriminatory.

Tradeoffs

The provision attempts to balance the need for increased park revenue with the desire to maintain robust international tourism. The tension lies in finding a surcharge amount that maximizes funds without significantly deterring visitors, which could have negative economic ripple effects.

Section 2(b)

Surcharge for National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Passes

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish a surcharge on the sale of National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Passes (e.g., the 'America the Beautiful' pass) when sold to international visitors. The Secretary can increase this surcharge over time. Unlike the unit-specific surcharges, the funds collected from this pass surcharge would be deposited into the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund, which is dedicated to addressing deferred maintenance projects across national parks and other public lands.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this