The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 2369·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 22, 2025

Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Dec 9, 2025

Bottom line

This bill mandates the removal or concealment of Francis Newlands' name from a public memorial fountain in Washington, D.C., reflecting ongoing efforts to reassess historical figures commemorated in public spaces.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to remove or permanently conceal all instances of Francis Newlands' name from the memorial fountain at Chevy Chase Circle in Washington, D.C. This includes a brass plaque, a stone projection, and carved names on coping stones. The removed items are to be offered to Newlands' descendants for a period of 60 days, and if unclaimed, they will be accessioned into the National Park Service's Rock Creek Park museum collection.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that removing Newlands' name is a necessary step to address his legacy as a proponent of segregation and white supremacy, ensuring that public spaces do not honor figures whose actions contradict modern values of equality and inclusion. They contend that public memorials should reflect the community's contemporary understanding of historical significance and moral principles.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that altering historical monuments amounts to "erasing history" and that understanding historical figures in their full context, including their flaws, is important for education. They may contend that such removals set a precedent for continually re-evaluating and potentially removing other historical markers, leading to an incomplete or sanitized view of the past.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

Removal or Concealment of Francis G. Newlands' Name

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates that the Secretary of the Interior take specific actions to eliminate the presence of Francis G. Newlands' name from the memorial fountain at Chevy Chase Circle. This includes removing a brass plaque, a stone projection, and carved names. The removed items are to be offered to Newlands' descendants for 60 days, after which they will become part of the National Park Service's Rock Creek Park museum collection.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDescendants of Francis Griffith NewlandsImpactOffered historical artifactsMechanismDirect offer of removed itemsScaleSpecific to the family
GroupNational Park ServiceImpactAdministrative responsibility for removal and potential accessioning of itemsMechanismDirected action by the Secretary of the InteriorScaleLocal administrative task
GroupResidents of Washington, D.C. and visitors to Chevy Chase CircleImpactChange in public commemoration and historical interpretationMechanismPhysical alteration of a public monumentScaleLocal cultural impact

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision directly addresses the problematic legacy of Francis Newlands, who was a known segregationist and white supremacist, by removing his name from a public memorial. They believe this action aligns public spaces with contemporary values of equity and justice, ensuring that figures with such histories are not honored in prominent public locations.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this provision represents an attempt to erase history rather than learn from it, arguing that monuments, even those to flawed figures, serve as reminders of the past. They may also suggest that the cost and effort of removal could be better spent on other community initiatives.

Tradeoffs

The provision navigates the tension between preserving historical artifacts and re-evaluating public commemoration in light of evolving societal values. It balances the desire to acknowledge historical figures with the imperative to avoid honoring individuals whose legacies are widely considered antithetical to modern principles of equality.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this