The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in ENGROSSED IN SENATEcompared with INTRODUCED IN SENATE (Jul 22, 2025)

Technical corrections only. The changes reflect the bill's progression from being introduced in the Senate to being engrossed by the Senate, including updating the legislative status and removing sponsor information. No substantive policy changes were made between v1 and v2.

S. 2379·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 22, 2025

Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act

Passed SenateLawMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Nov 20, 2025

Bottom line

This bill establishes a federally supported resource center to enhance the security and safety of State and local judicial officers and court staff by centralizing threat intelligence, training, and coordination efforts.

What it actually does

This bill amends the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 to authorize the State Justice Institute (SJI) to provide financial and technical support to eligible national nonprofit organizations. This support is for establishing and operating a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center. The center will provide security training, monitor threats, coordinate with law enforcement, develop reporting standards, create a national threat database, and conduct research to enhance the safety of state and local judges and court staff.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is a crucial step to protect the judiciary, which has faced increasing threats. They contend that a centralized resource center will provide essential tools, training, and coordination for State and local courts, which often lack the resources of their federal counterparts, ensuring the safety of those upholding the rule of law and preserving judicial independence.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that while judicial security is important, creating a new federal-backed center could lead to mission creep, duplicate existing efforts by federal agencies like the U.S. Marshals Service or local law enforcement, or impose unfunded mandates on State and local entities for reporting and coordination. Some may also raise concerns about the privacy implications of a national threat database.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions.

Section 2

Defines 'Eligible Organization' for Funding

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 to define what constitutes an 'eligible organization.' Such an organization must be a national nonprofit with specific expertise in judicial security, courthouse design, State judicial operations, and experience working with diverse State and local court systems, including rural and limited-jurisdiction courts. This definition ensures that only qualified entities can receive funding to establish the new threat intelligence center.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNational nonprofit organizationsImpactCreates a specific set of criteria they must meet to be eligible for federal funding under this Act.MechanismAmends 42 U.S.C. 10701 by adding paragraph (9).ScaleAffects a limited number of specialized national nonprofits.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this definition ensures that the critical task of establishing a judicial threat intelligence center is entrusted to organizations with proven expertise and a comprehensive understanding of the unique challenges faced by State and local judiciaries, maximizing the effectiveness of federal investment.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that the definition is overly prescriptive, potentially limiting competition or favoring a specific existing organization, thereby reducing flexibility or innovation in how judicial security solutions are developed.

Tradeoffs

Balances the desire for specialized expertise with potential concerns about limiting the pool of eligible organizations.

Section 3

Authorizes State Judicial Threat Intelligence and Resource Center

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the State Justice Institute Act to authorize the State Justice Institute (SJI) to provide financial and technical support to eligible organizations for establishing and operating a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center. The center's functions include providing judicial security training, monitoring threats, coordinating with law enforcement, developing standardized incident reporting, creating a national threat database, and conducting research on best practices for judicial security.

Section 4

Mandates Annual Reports on Judicial Threats

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section requires the State Justice Institute to submit an annual report to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees. The report, due one year after the establishment of the threat intelligence center, must detail the number of threats to State and local judiciary members and court staff, including breakdowns by threat type and seriousness level.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this