The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 2504·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 29, 2025

American Grown Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Sullivan, Dan [R-AK]
Committees
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 29, 2025

Bottom line

The bill aims to boost the domestic cut flower and green industry by requiring key federal agencies to prioritize American-grown products in their procurement and display practices.

What it actually does

This bill, titled the 'American Grown Act,' mandates that the Executive Office of the President, the Department of Defense, and the Department of State must procure cut flowers and cut greens grown in the United States or its territories. It also establishes specific conditions for these agencies to accept gifts of foreign-grown cut flowers or greens from foreign governments or their agents, requiring concurrent display of a domestically grown equivalent and clear labeling of origin.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will strengthen the American agricultural sector, particularly the cut flower and green industry, by ensuring federal dollars support domestic jobs and businesses. They contend it promotes economic security and national pride by showcasing American products in official government settings and diplomatic engagements.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that this mandate could lead to increased costs for federal agencies due to potentially higher prices for domestically sourced products compared to international markets. They may also raise concerns about potential impacts on international trade relations or the administrative burden of managing the dual display requirement for diplomatic gifts.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for immediate understanding and evaluation by any interested reader.

Section 2(b)

Domestic Procurement Requirement for Cut Flowers and Greens

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Executive Office of the President, the Department of Defense, and the Department of State may only use appropriated funds to purchase cut flowers and cut greens that are grown within a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, a U.S. territory or possession, or an area subject to a federally recognized Indian Tribe's jurisdiction. This requirement applies to all procurements made or contracted for in the United States, starting one year after the bill's enactment.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. cut flower and green growersImpactPositive economic impactMechanismIncreased demand and guaranteed market share from federal agencies.ScalePotentially significant for the domestic industry, depending on the volume of federal procurement.
GroupCovered federal agencies (Executive Office of the President, DoD, DoS)ImpactAdministrative and potential cost impactMechanismRequirement to adjust procurement policies to source domestically, potentially incurring higher costs.ScaleMinor administrative adjustment, potentially minor budget increase.
GroupForeign cut flower and green growersImpactNegative economic impactMechanismLoss of market share in U.S. federal procurement.ScaleMinor, as federal procurement is a small fraction of the global market.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly supports American agriculture, fostering job creation and economic growth in communities involved in the cut flower and green industry. They believe it reinforces 'Buy American' principles and ensures that taxpayer dollars are reinvested domestically.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this mandate could lead to federal agencies paying higher prices for flowers and greens, as domestic options may be more expensive than imported ones. They could also argue it limits choice and flexibility in procurement, potentially impacting the aesthetic or specific needs for certain events.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire to support domestic industries and jobs against potential increases in procurement costs for federal agencies and possible limitations on product availability or variety.

Section 2(c)

Conditions for Accepting Foreign-Grown Floral Gifts

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision outlines specific rules for covered agencies when accepting gifts of cut flowers or greens from foreign governments or their agents if those items were not grown in a qualifying U.S. area. Agencies may only accept such gifts for display if the origin of the gift is clearly displayed upon delivery, and the agency simultaneously procures and displays an additional cut flower or green grown in a qualifying U.S. area. The origin of the foreign gift must remain clearly displayed throughout its exhibition.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this