The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
Back to REPORTED TO SENATE
Comparev1INTRODUCED IN SENATEJul 29→v2REPORTED TO SENATEAug 4
TransformativeINTRODUCED IN SENATE → REPORTED TO SENATE

What changed between these versions

A complete substitute amendment, v2 extends key implementation timelines from four to five years and introduces new provisions for enhanced data accessibility, student data correction processes, and congressional oversight. It also slightly expands the scope of data elements to include workforce programs and Workforce Pell Grants. The core intent of establishing a postsecondary student data system remains consistent.

Overview

Extensive changes throughout the bill, particularly within the detailed provisions for the Postsecondary Student Data System, alongside the addition of a new implementation oversight section. · v2 expands and clarifies the implementation requirements, data elements, and privacy protections, while also extending the timelines for system establishment and adding new congressional oversight mechanisms.

v2 is a complete substitute amendment that significantly refines the framework for the College Transparency Act. Key changes include extending the development timeline for the Postsecondary Student Data System from four to five years and introducing a new Section 6 for dedicated implementation staffing and quarterly congressional reporting. The bill also enhances student data correction processes, expands consumer testing requirements for publicly available information, and explicitly details data restrictions for vetted research purposes. The fundamental goal of establishing a comprehensive student data system remains unchanged.

+

Major additions

+
Section 2(l)(4)(D)(vi)

This new subclause requires that the publicly available information from the data system be provided in formats accessible to individuals with disabilities and compliant with the most recent Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, or successor guidelines.

This addition ensures that the critical information provided by the data system is usable by all individuals, including those with disabilities, thereby broadening access and promoting inclusivity in educational decision-making.

+
Section 6

This new section mandates that the Secretary of Education and the Commissioner for Education Statistics provide dedicated and adequate staffing for the implementation of the Act and its amendments. It also requires them to report quarterly to specific Congressional committees (Senate HELP and Appropriations; House Education and Workforce and Appropriations) on the progress of implementation, covering aspects like staffing, privacy procedures, Advisory Committee establishment, public information development, and communications to institutions.

This addition creates a formal, ongoing oversight mechanism for Congress to monitor the implementation of the College Transparency Act, ensuring accountability and transparency in the development and operation of the postsecondary student data system. It also ensures dedicated resources for the complex implementation process.

~

Modifications

~
Section 2(l)(1)(A)
Timeline for system establishment extended.

Provides an additional year for the Commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics to develop and maintain the system, potentially delaying the availability of the system and its associated data for students, families, and researchers.

Before

Mandated the establishment of the postsecondary student data system not later than 4 years after the date of enactment.

After

Mandates the establishment of the postsecondary student data system not later than 5 years after the date of enactment.

~
Section 2(l)(2)(A)
Timeline for data element determination extended.

Extends the period for defining the specific data points to be included in the system by one year, potentially delaying the comprehensive data collection process.

Before

Required the Commissioner, in consultation with the Advisory Committee, to determine data elements within 4 years after the date of enactment.

After

Requires the Commissioner, in consultation with the Advisory Committee, to determine data elements within 5 years after the date of enactment.

~
Section 2(l)(2)(C)(ii)
Scope of credential levels for data reporting expanded.

Institutions will need to collect and report data for students in eligible workforce programs, providing a more comprehensive view of postsecondary outcomes, particularly for vocational and technical training, which was not explicitly covered in v1.

Before

Required reporting student enrollment, persistence, retention, transfer, and completion measures for various credential levels, including certificate, associate, baccalaureate, and advanced degree levels.

After

Expands the required reporting to include "eligible workforce programs under section 481(b)(3)" alongside the existing credential levels for which student enrollment, persistence, retention, transfer, and completion measures are reported.

~
Section 2(l)(2)(C)(ii)(X)
Specificity of Pell Grant recipient status enhanced.

Allows for more granular tracking and analysis of students receiving Workforce Pell Grants, providing better insights into the financial aid utilization and outcomes of students in workforce development programs, which was not explicitly detailed in v1.

Before

Required reporting on Federal Pell Grant recipient status under section 401.

After

Clarifies and expands the required reporting to include "status as a recipient of a Workforce Pell Grant under section 401(k)" in addition to general Federal Pell Grant recipient status.

~
Section 2(l)(3)(C)(iv)
Student data correction process enhanced with specific staffing requirements.

Students seeking to inspect or correct their personal data within the system are expected to receive more direct and supported assistance, potentially improving the accuracy and trustworthiness of the data and student experience.

Before

Mandated the Commissioner to establish a process for students to request access to their personal information for inspection and request corrections to inaccuracies, with a written response to every correction request.

After

Expands on the student correction process, requiring the Commissioner to "provide dedicated and adequate staffing to field and respond to inquiries from students" regarding access and corrections, in addition to responding in writing to every request.

~
Section 2(l)(4)(D)(v)
Frequency and scope of consumer testing for public information expanded.

Ensures that the user-friendly consumer information website and analytic tool are regularly reviewed and refined based on feedback from a diverse and representative set of potential users, making the information more relevant and accessible to various student populations.

Before

Required the Commissioner to conduct consumer testing to determine how to make the publicly available information as meaningful to users as possible.

After

Changes the requirement to "conduct biannual consumer testing" and specifies a broad list of groups to be included in this testing, such as prospective first-generation college students, low-income students, English learners, adult students, veterans, servicemembers, students' families, institutions, counselors, and nonprofit consumer groups.

~
Section 2(l)(5)(A)(i)
Explicit restrictions on student-level data for research purposes clarified and detailed.

Provides greater clarity and stronger privacy assurances by explicitly enumerating categories of sensitive information that will be excluded from student-level data shared for research, reinforcing data minimization and privacy protections for individuals.

Before

Required the Commissioner to develop a secure process for making student-level, non-personally identifiable information, with direct identifiers removed, available for vetted research and evaluation purposes, compatible with NCES restricted-use survey data practices.

After

Restructures this provision into two subclauses: (I) Student-level data, which maintains the core requirement, and (II) Restrictions, which explicitly lists types of data (e.g., individual health data, student discipline records, elementary or secondary education data, exact address, citizenship status, migrant status, national origin status, course grades, postsecondary entrance examination results, political affiliation, or religion) that shall *not* be included in the student-level data made available for vetted research.

~
Section 4(b)
Effective date for institutional data submission requirements extended.

Provides institutions of higher education an additional year to prepare for and comply with the new data collection and submission requirements under the Postsecondary Student Data System, potentially easing the transition burden.

Before

Stated that the amendment to institutional requirements (Section 4(a)) would take effect 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

After

Stated that the amendment to institutional requirements (Section 4(a)) would take effect 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

Scope

Complete substitute — Changes are scattered throughout the core provisions of the Postsecondary Student Data System (Section 2) and include a new standalone section (Section 6), indicating a broad but targeted set of refinements. — While the fundamental policy direction of establishing a postsecondary student data system remains consistent, v2 introduces meaningful refinements in implementation, data scope, privacy, and oversight, indicating a more robust and detailed approach to the original policy. — The changes primarily refine and expand upon the mechanisms established in v1 for the data system. The new Section 6 creates additional oversight requirements that interact with the overall implementation of the Act, and the extended timelines affect all related deadlines.

Impact analysis

Students (including first-generation, low-income, English learners, adult students, veterans, servicemembers, and prospective students)

Positive, as it provides more relevant information, better support for data correction, and stronger privacy safeguards.

Will have access to a data system that includes more comprehensive information on workforce programs and Workforce Pell Grants. The process for correcting their personal data is enhanced with dedicated staffing. Publicly available information will be more accessible and tailored to their diverse needs due to expanded consumer testing and accessibility guidelines. Privacy protections for their data used in research are more explicitly defined.

Institutions of Higher Education participating in Title IV programs

Mixed; the extended timeline is beneficial, but the expanded data requirements represent an increased reporting scope.

Have an additional year (from 4 to 5 years) to implement the required data collection and submission for the new system. They will also need to collect and report data for students in "eligible workforce programs" and specifically track "Workforce Pell Grant" recipients.

Federal Agencies (Commissioner of NCES, Secretary of Education, Treasury, Defense, VA, Census, FSA, SSA, BLS)

Procedural and expanded responsibility; the extended timelines offer flexibility, but new staffing, testing, and reporting requirements increase workload and accountability.

The Commissioner of NCES has an additional year for system establishment and data element determination. The Commissioner is also mandated to provide dedicated staffing for student data inquiries and to conduct biannual, expanded consumer testing. All relevant agencies are subject to new explicit restrictions on data use for research. The Secretary and Commissioner are subject to new quarterly reporting requirements to Congress on implementation progress.

Congress (specifically the Committees on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions and Appropriations of the Senate, and Education and Workforce and Appropriations of the House)

Procedural; enhances oversight capabilities.

Will receive quarterly reports on the progress of implementing the Postsecondary Student Data System, including staffing, privacy procedures, Advisory Committee establishment, public information development, and communications to institutions.

Ask Ledger AI about this