The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 2661·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 1, 2025

A bill to allow for the use of risk-based inspections for in-service breakout tanks.

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]
Committees
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 1, 2025

Bottom line

This bill shifts federal oversight of breakout tank inspections from a prescriptive schedule to a risk-based approach, aiming to enhance efficiency and safety by prioritizing resources.

What it actually does

This bill permits owners and operators of pipeline facilities to use risk-based inspections for their in-service breakout tanks to comply with federal safety requirements. It also mandates the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to revise its existing regulations (49 CFR 195.432) to formally allow and establish guidelines for these risk-based inspection methods. The intent is to modernize inspection practices by focusing resources on higher-risk assets.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that risk-based inspections are a more efficient and effective way to ensure safety by allowing operators to focus resources on tanks that pose the greatest risk, based on their condition, age, and operational environment. This approach can reduce unnecessary inspections on low-risk assets, saving costs without compromising safety, and aligns with modern asset management practices in other industries.

Opponents contend

Opponents might express concerns that moving away from prescriptive inspection schedules could lead to a reduction in overall inspection frequency or thoroughness, potentially increasing the risk of undetected failures. They may argue that a uniform, mandated schedule provides a baseline level of safety that a risk-based approach, if not rigorously implemented and overseen, might undermine.

The bill text is extremely short and can be read in under a minute, allowing ample time for stakeholders to understand its direct implications.

Section 1(a) and (b)

Authorization and Mandate for Risk-Based Inspections of Breakout Tanks

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes owners and operators of pipeline facilities to use risk-based inspection methods for their in-service breakout tanks to meet federal safety regulations. Currently, inspections might follow a more rigid schedule. The bill also directs the Secretary of Transportation, through the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), to update existing regulations (specifically 49 CFR 195.432) to formally permit and outline the use of these risk-based inspections. This aims to allow for more flexible and targeted safety oversight.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupPipeline facility owners and operatorsImpactOperational flexibility and potential cost savingsMechanismAllows adoption of risk-based inspection programs instead of prescriptive ones.ScaleIndustry-wide for facilities with breakout tanks.
GroupPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)ImpactRegulatory amendment workload and oversight shiftMechanismMandated to revise 49 CFR 195.432 to accommodate risk-based inspections.ScaleAffects regulatory framework for tank safety.
GroupPublic and environmentImpactPotential for enhanced or diminished safety outcomesMechanismChanges in inspection methodologies could alter the likelihood of tank failures and associated spills.ScaleLocalized environmental and safety risks near pipeline facilities.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that allowing risk-based inspections will enable operators to allocate resources more effectively, focusing on tanks with higher potential for failure or greater consequence, thereby improving overall safety outcomes while reducing compliance costs. This approach is seen as a modern best practice in industrial safety management.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that a shift to risk-based inspections, if not accompanied by stringent oversight and clear standards, could lead to operators underestimating risks or deferring necessary maintenance on tanks deemed "low risk," potentially increasing the overall likelihood of incidents. They may prefer the predictability and uniform safety baseline of prescriptive schedules.

Tradeoffs

The bill navigates the tension between regulatory flexibility and prescriptive safety standards. it seeks to balance the industry's desire for more efficient, risk-informed operations with the public's need for robust safety oversight to prevent spills and accidents. The effectiveness hinges on the quality of risk assessments and PHMSA's revised regulations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this