The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
3 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN HOUSEcompared with ENGROSSED IN SENATE (Jun 18, 2025)

Technical corrections only. The only changes between v2 and v3 are updates to the legislative status information, indicating the bill's referral to the House Committee on Natural Resources and the addition of the Secretary's name. No substantive policy changes were made to the bill text.

S. 282·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 28, 2025

Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument Access Act

Passed SenatePublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 10, 2026

Bottom line

The bill expands the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, aiming to enhance regional access and recreational opportunities while preserving traditional uses and ensuring public safety in areas with active logging.

What it actually does

This bill, the "Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument Access Act," authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire additional land from willing sellers to expand the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument in Maine. It mandates the continuation of existing hunting, fishing, and outdoor recreation activities on acquired lands, allows for noncommercial gathering of fiddlehead ferns, and requires collaboration with local and Tribal governments for public education and public safety regarding logging operations. It also permits the acquisition of up to 10 acres for administrative and visitor facilities outside the monument boundaries.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill enhances public access to the National Monument, supports local economies through increased tourism and recreational opportunities, and respects traditional land uses by explicitly allowing hunting, fishing, and fiddlehead fern gathering. They emphasize the importance of collaborative management with local and Tribal communities to ensure safe and educational experiences, while also protecting existing timber access rights and prohibiting eminent domain.

Opponents contend

Critics might express concerns about the expansion of federal land ownership, potentially impacting local tax bases or state jurisdiction over land management, even with the willing seller clause. Some may also argue that allowing specific activities like noncommercial timber harvests or fiddlehead fern gathering within a National Monument could set precedents that dilute the primary conservation mission of such designations, or that the administrative costs of expansion could be a burden on taxpayers.

The bill is short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 3

Expansion of National Monument Boundaries

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire additional land or interests in land within a specifically designated "Authorized Acquisition Area" that lies outside the current boundary of the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument. Crucially, these acquisitions can only occur through voluntary means, such as purchase from willing sellers, donation, or exchange, with an explicit prohibition on the use of eminent domain. Once the Secretary acquires any such land, it will automatically be incorporated into the National Monument, and the monument's official boundaries will be adjusted to reflect this expansion, thereby increasing the total protected area.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupLandowners within the "Authorized Acquisition Area"ImpactOpportunity to sell land to the federal government.MechanismVoluntary sale, donation, or exchange.ScaleIndividual property owners.
GroupFederal government (National Park Service)ImpactIncreased land management responsibilities and costs.MechanismAcquisition and integration into National Monument.ScaleRegional.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this expansion provides critical buffer zones, enhances ecological connectivity, and improves public access points to the monument, fulfilling the original intent of the monument's establishment by consolidating federal ownership in key areas without forcing sales.

Critics contend

Some may argue that any expansion of federal land, even through willing sellers, reduces the local tax base and shifts land management authority away from local and state control, potentially impacting local economies and resource use patterns.

Tradeoffs

Balances the desire for monument expansion and conservation with respect for private property rights and local control by prohibiting eminent domain.

Section 4(b)

Preservation of Hunting, Fishing, and Outdoor Recreation

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision ensures that traditional outdoor recreational activities, specifically hunting, fishing, and other forms of outdoor recreation, will continue to be allowed on any new lands acquired for the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument. The key condition is that these activities must have been in existence on the day before the land was acquired by the federal government. Furthermore, the management of these activities by the Secretary of the Interior must remain consistent with the existing management framework established by the original Presidential Proclamation that created the National Monument, thereby preserving long-standing local practices.

Section 4(c)

Allowance for Noncommercial Fiddlehead Fern Gathering

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section specifically grants permission for the general public to gather fiddlehead ferns (Matteuccia struthiopteris) by hand within the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument. This gathering is strictly for noncommercial personal use and consumption, acknowledging a traditional local practice. However, the provision also includes an important safeguard: the Secretary of the Interior retains the authority to limit this gathering if it is determined that such activity could negatively impact the natural resources of the National Monument. Any such limitations would be implemented in accordance with existing applicable regulations to ensure ecological protection.

Sections 4(f) and 4(g)

Protection of Existing Timber Access and Public Safety Measures

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision addresses the coexistence of the National Monument with the region's active timber industry. It explicitly safeguards "valid existing rights," including the crucial rights of access through the National Monument for the purpose of removing timber from areas located outside the monument's boundaries. Additionally, the bill mandates that the Secretary of the Interior implement measures to enhance public safety. This includes providing appropriate safety education and notification materials to visitors about interacting with logging trucks, equipment, and operations on roads within or adjacent to the monument, and collaborating with stakeholders to establish effective safety procedures.

Section 5

Establishment of Administrative and Visitor Facilities

mentioned in summarystraightforward

To facilitate the efficient administration and enhance visitor services for the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, this section authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire a limited amount of land, specifically not more than 10 acres. These acquisitions, which can include existing improvements, must be located outside the monument's official boundaries but within its general vicinity. Furthermore, the Secretary is empowered to enter into cooperative agreements with the State of Maine, Tribal or local governments, or private entities. These agreements can be for carrying out the provisions of this section, including the development of a collaborative information center for the National Monument, thereby improving visitor experience and local engagement.

FOUND

Explicitly prohibits the use of eminent domain for acquiring land or interests in land within the authorized acquisition area for the National Monument.

Section 3(b)(2)

Why it matters:This is a standard legislative practice to reassure landowners and local communities when federal land expansion is proposed, often included to mitigate potential opposition. It's not evasive but rather a specific limitation on federal power.

Case for: Supporters argue this protects private property rights and ensures that any expansion is based on voluntary transactions, fostering trust and cooperation with local communities.

Case against: No direct case against this specific prohibition, as it's a protection. However, some might argue that in rare cases, eminent domain could be a necessary tool for critical conservation or access if voluntary acquisition fails, though this is a very unlikely argument in this context.

Estimated impact: Ensures all land acquisitions for the monument expansion are voluntary, potentially slowing down or limiting the extent of expansion if willing sellers are not found, but preventing forced sales.

FOUND

Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to conduct noncommercial timber harvests within the National Monument, as determined necessary and in accordance with the monument's management plan.

Section 4(e)

Why it matters:This provision is likely included to allow for active forest management practices, such as thinning for forest health, fire mitigation, or habitat restoration, which are distinct from commercial logging. It's not necessarily evasive but might be overlooked by those expecting a strict "hands-off" approach to monument management.

Case for: Proponents argue this allows for responsible, science-based forest management to maintain ecological health, reduce wildfire risk, and enhance specific habitats, aligning with modern conservation practices that often involve active intervention.

Case against: Some environmental groups might express concern that any form of timber harvest, even noncommercial, could disrupt natural processes or set a precedent for more intensive resource extraction within a protected area, potentially conflicting with the "monument" designation.

Estimated impact: Allows for active ecological management within the monument, potentially altering forest structure and composition in specific areas for conservation goals, without generating revenue from timber sales.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this