A bill to authorize the use of off-highway vehicles in certain areas of the Capitol Reef National Park, Utah.
- Sponsor
- Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]
- Committees
- Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Sep 30, 2026
Bottom line
The bill shifts regulatory authority for off-highway vehicle use on designated Capitol Reef National Park roads from federal to Utah State law, potentially expanding OHV access.
What it actually does
This bill authorizes the use of off-highway vehicles (OHVs) on a specific list of roads within Capitol Reef National Park in Utah. It achieves this by explicitly stating that Utah State law, which defines and regulates OHV use, shall apply to motor vehicles, including OHVs, on these designated "covered roads" within the park boundaries.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that this bill provides greater recreational access for off-highway vehicle enthusiasts to enjoy Capitol Reef National Park, aligning federal land management with local preferences and state regulations. They contend it respects Utah's sovereignty in managing vehicle use on roads within its borders, enhancing tourism and local economies by making the park more accessible to a popular form of recreation.
Opponents contend
Opponents may argue that allowing off-highway vehicles in a national park could lead to increased noise pollution, environmental damage to sensitive ecosystems, and potential conflicts with other park users seeking quiet recreation. They might contend that national parks should prioritize conservation and traditional forms of recreation, and that deferring to state law could undermine federal protections for these unique natural areas.
The bill text is very short and straightforward, allowing for quick comprehension of its core purpose.
Section 1(b)
Application of State Law to Off-Highway Vehicle Use
This provision mandates that Utah State law will govern the use of all motor vehicles, including off-highway vehicles (OHVs), on a specific list of roads located within Capitol Reef National Park. This means that instead of federal park regulations, the rules and definitions established by the State of Utah regarding OHVs will dictate their operation on these designated park roads.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that applying Utah State law to these specific roads will streamline regulations and provide clarity for OHV users, encouraging responsible recreation while boosting local tourism. They emphasize that these are existing roads, not new trails, and that state laws are often robust enough to manage vehicle use effectively.
Critics contend
Critics contend that allowing state law to supersede federal park regulations could weaken environmental protections and compromise the natural quiet and scenic values that national parks are meant to preserve. They argue that national parks require a consistent, higher standard of protection than state lands, and that increased OHV traffic could degrade the visitor experience for those seeking solitude.
Tradeoffs
The provision balances the desire for increased recreational access for OHV users with the National Park Service's mandate to preserve natural and cultural resources and provide for the enjoyment of all visitors. It also highlights a tension between federal oversight of national park lands and state-level control over vehicle use within its borders.