The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 3052·119th Congress·Introduced Oct 23, 2025

A bill to promote recruiter access to secondary schools.

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecurityMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]
Committees
Armed Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 23, 2025

Bottom line

The bill significantly expands military recruiters' access to secondary school campuses and student personal data, aiming to enhance military recruitment efforts by standardizing and increasing interaction opportunities while reducing student privacy controls.

What it actually does

This bill amends federal law to mandate that secondary schools provide military recruiters with the same access to campuses as other recruiters, facilitate at least four in-person recruitment events per academic year, and furnish specific student directory information (names, grades, addresses, emails, phone numbers) to military recruiters within defined timeframes. Crucially, it explicitly overrides certain privacy protections under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) for this data sharing.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill ensures military recruiters have equitable and effective access to potential recruits, which is vital for national security and maintaining an all-volunteer force. They contend that providing student data streamlines recruitment, allowing the military to reach eligible students efficiently, and that military service offers valuable career paths and opportunities that students should be fully aware of.

Opponents contend

Opponents express significant concerns about student privacy, arguing that sharing personal data with military recruiters without explicit parental consent infringes on privacy rights and could expose students to unwanted recruitment pressure. They may also contend that mandating specific access levels and events could disrupt school operations or inappropriately prioritize military recruitment over other post-secondary options.

The bill is exceptionally short and straightforward, allowing for a quick and comprehensive reading and evaluation.

Section 1(1), amending 10 U.S.C. 503(c)(1)(A)(i)

Mandates Equal Access for Military Recruiters

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires secondary schools to provide military recruiters the same level of access to school campuses for recruiting students aged 17 and older as they provide to any other prospective employer, institution of higher education, or recruiter. This ensures military recruiters are not treated differently from other entities seeking to engage with students, standardizing their access.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSecondary schoolsImpactIncreased administrative burden to ensure equitable access; potential for more military recruiter presence on campus.MechanismLegal mandate under 10 U.S.C. 503(c)(1)(A)(i).ScaleApplies to all secondary schools served by local educational agencies.
GroupMilitary recruitersImpactGuaranteed equal access to school campuses, removing potential barriers.MechanismLegal mandate.ScaleNational.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this ensures fairness and prevents discrimination against military recruiters, aligning military recruitment with other career and educational opportunities presented to students, which is crucial for national security.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that 'equal access' could still lead to increased pressure on students if military recruitment tactics are perceived differently than those of other employers or colleges, potentially creating an imbalance in career guidance.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the military's need for access to potential recruits with schools' autonomy in managing campus visitors and ensuring a balanced presentation of post-secondary options.

Section 1(2), amending 10 U.S.C. 503(c)(1)(A)(ii)

Requires Minimum In-Person Recruitment Events

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that secondary schools, upon request from military recruiters, must facilitate at least four in-person recruitment events per academic year. These events must be spread across different grading periods and may include career fairs or other engagement opportunities, ensuring consistent interaction opportunities for recruiters.

Section 1(3), amending 10 U.S.C. 503(c)(1)(A)(iii)

Requires Sharing of Student Directory Information, Overriding FERPA

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision requires secondary schools to provide military recruiters with specific student directory information: names, academic grades, addresses, electronic mail addresses (school-provided if available), and telephone and mobile phone listings. This data must be provided within 60 days of the academic year's start and within 30 days of any subsequent recruiter request. Critically, it explicitly overrides subsection (a)(5) of section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g), which is the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), concerning this specific data sharing.

FOUND

This clause explicitly states that the requirement for schools to provide student directory information to military recruiters overrides a specific subsection of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which generally allows parents to opt out of the disclosure of directory information.

Section 1(3), specifically 'notwithstanding subsection (a)(5) of section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g).'

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for clarifying legal precedence when a new provision might conflict with existing law. While technically phrased, its impact is highly significant for student privacy.

Case for: Supporters argue this override is necessary to ensure military recruiters have the same access to student data as other entities, preventing schools from using FERPA as a barrier to military recruitment efforts deemed essential for national security.

Case against: Critics argue this directly undermines student privacy protections afforded by FERPA, potentially exposing students to unwanted contact without parental consent and setting a concerning precedent for data sharing.

Estimated impact: Significantly alters student privacy rights regarding military recruitment across all secondary schools by removing parental opt-out options for directory information.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this