The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 316·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 29, 2025

Grizzly Bear State Management Act of 2025

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 29, 2025

Bottom line

This bill aims to permanently delist the GYE grizzly bear population by legislatively mandating the reissuance of a prior delisting rule and eliminating judicial oversight.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a specific 2017 final rule that removed the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) population of grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. Crucially, the bill explicitly states that this reissuance shall not be subject to judicial review, effectively bypassing potential legal challenges that have previously blocked similar delisting efforts.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the GYE grizzly bear population has recovered sufficiently to no longer warrant Endangered Species Act (ESA) protection, demonstrating successful conservation efforts. They contend that state wildlife agencies are best equipped to manage the recovered population, allowing for more localized and responsive management strategies, including potential hunting, which can help mitigate human-bear conflicts. They also emphasize the importance of respecting state sovereignty in wildlife management and preventing endless litigation.

Opponents contend

Opponents argue that delisting the GYE grizzly bear population is premature, citing concerns about genetic diversity, long-term viability, and potential threats from climate change and habitat fragmentation. They contend that state management plans may not provide adequate protections, particularly if hunting is allowed, and that removing judicial review undermines environmental safeguards and public oversight, setting a dangerous precedent.

The bill text is extremely short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for public review.

Section 2(a)

Mandate to Reissue Grizzly Bear Delisting Rule

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Secretary of the Interior to re-publish the final rule from June 30, 2017, which removed the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear population from the federal list of endangered and threatened species. This action must occur within 180 days of the bill's enactment and is specifically exempted from other laws that would normally apply to such a rule issuance, streamlining the delisting process.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGreater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear populationImpactRemoval from federal protection under the Endangered Species Act, transferring management to states.MechanismReissuance of the 2017 delisting rule.ScaleAffects the entire GYE population.
GroupStates (Wyoming, Montana, Idaho)ImpactGain primary management authority over grizzly bears within their borders.MechanismTransfer of authority from federal to state agencies.ScaleSignificant increase in state wildlife management responsibilities.
GroupEnvironmental advocacy groupsImpactLoss of federal protections for grizzly bears, reduced avenues for legal challenge.MechanismDelisting and prohibition of judicial review.ScaleSignificant impact on their conservation efforts.
GroupLocal communities and livestock producers in GYEImpactPotential for increased state-managed hunting opportunities, potentially reduced bear-human conflict.MechanismState management plans, including potential hunting seasons.ScaleLocalized impact on human-wildlife interactions.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that the GYE grizzly bear population has met all recovery criteria, making federal protection unnecessary. They contend that reissuing the rule allows states to manage the species effectively, reflecting local conditions and expertise, and that continued federal oversight is an overreach.

Critics contend

Opponents argue that the GYE grizzly bear population remains vulnerable due to habitat fragmentation, climate change impacts on food sources, and genetic isolation. They contend that delisting is premature and that state management may not prioritize long-term conservation, potentially leading to population declines.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances federal oversight under the ESA with state sovereignty in wildlife management. It also weighs the perceived success of recovery efforts against concerns about the long-term viability and genetic health of the population without federal protections.

Section 2(b)

Prohibition of Judicial Review

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly states that the reissuance of the final rule, as directed by subsection (a), cannot be challenged in court. This means that environmental groups or other parties would be unable to sue to block the delisting of the GYE grizzly bears, ensuring the finality of the administrative action.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this