The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 3182·119th Congress·Introduced Nov 18, 2025

No Torts for Trump Act

IntroducedLawSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Nov 18, 2025

Bottom line

The bill aims to restrict a President's ability to use the Federal Tort Claims Act to pursue personal legal claims, particularly those related to actions taken before or during their presidency.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) to prevent any sitting President, or any individual who becomes President while a claim is pending, from seeking relief under Chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code. This prohibition applies to all claims, regardless of when the act or omission giving rise to the claim occurred, and to any claim pending on or brought after the bill's enactment.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is necessary to prevent potential abuses of power or conflicts of interest where a President might use the FTCA for personal gain or to silence critics, especially concerning past actions. They contend that the presidency should not confer special legal advantages for personal tort claims and that this measure promotes accountability and prevents the weaponization of legal processes.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that this bill unfairly targets a specific individual or office, potentially undermining the legal rights of a President as a citizen. They could contend that it sets a dangerous precedent by selectively removing legal avenues, and that existing legal frameworks are sufficient to address any potential abuses without needing a specific prohibition against the President.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(a) and (b)

Prohibition on Presidential Claims Under Federal Tort Claims Act

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends existing law (28 U.S.C. 2680) to add a new exception, specifically preventing the President, or anyone who becomes President while a claim is ongoing, from bringing any claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). This means a President cannot sue the government for torts (civil wrongs) committed by federal employees. The amendment applies retroactively to any claim already pending or brought after the bill's enactment, regardless of when the underlying event occurred.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupThe President of the United States (current and future)ImpactProhibited from seeking relief under the FTCA for personal tort claims.MechanismAmends 28 U.S.C. 2680 to add a specific exception for presidential claims.ScaleApplies to all claims by a President, regardless of origin or timing relative to their presidency.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision closes a potential loophole where a President might use the FTCA for personal legal battles, potentially diverting government resources or creating conflicts of interest. They assert it ensures that the office of the President is not used to gain an unfair advantage in personal litigation.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this provision unfairly singles out the President, potentially denying them the same legal recourse available to other citizens. They could argue it sets a precedent for selectively stripping legal rights based on office, which could be seen as politically motivated or an overreach.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire to prevent potential abuse of presidential power in personal litigation against the principle of equal access to justice for all citizens, including the President. It also raises questions about the scope of presidential immunity and accountability.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this