The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
3 versions
SubstantiveWhat changed in ENGROSSED IN SENATEcompared with REPORTED TO SENATE (Sep 14, 2026)
See full diff

No substantive changes. The Engrossed in Senate version (v3) is identical in operative text to the Reported in Senate version (v2), reflecting that the amendments were incorporated prior to the reporting of the bill.

S. 3258·119th Congress·Introduced Nov 20, 2025

Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026

Passed SenateTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL]
Committees
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 1, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to enhance transparency and accessibility of medication guidance for aviation personnel seeking medical certification or clearance from the FAA.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator publish and maintain a publicly available, user-friendly list of medications that are approved or not approved for airmen and air traffic control specialists. The list must include conditions for safe use, contra-indications, and be developed in consultation with various aviation stakeholders.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will improve aviation safety by providing clear, accessible information to airmen and air traffic control specialists about medications, reducing confusion and potential non-compliance. It is expected to streamline the medical certification process and foster better communication between medical providers and the FAA.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while transparency is beneficial, the FAA already provides similar information through the frequently updated Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners. They may express concerns about the administrative burden and cost of maintaining a separate, publicly available list, especially ensuring its meticulous accuracy and consistency with existing, dynamic FAA guidance.

The bill is concise and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick and thorough understanding of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Purpose and Scope

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section outlines the bill's intent: to inform aviation stakeholders, including airmen and air traffic control specialists, about medications on "Do Not Issue" or "Do Not Fly" lists, medications that are safe to use (over-the-counter or prescribed), and the conditions under which these safe medications can be used in an aviation environment, consistent with the FAA's Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupAirmen, air traffic control specialists, individuals training to become airmen or air traffic control specialistsImpactIncreased clarity and access to critical medical information.MechanismExplicit statement of purpose guiding the FAA's actions.ScaleBroad, affecting all current and prospective aviation personnel requiring medical certification.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this purpose statement clearly articulates the need for transparency, ensuring that the FAA's subsequent actions align with the goal of providing essential, user-friendly medication guidance to the aviation community, thereby enhancing safety and compliance.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against a purpose statement, as it merely defines the bill's intent.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies in balancing the desire for comprehensive information with the need for simplicity and user-friendliness, and ensuring the information remains consistent with existing, frequently updated FAA medical guidance.

Section 2(b) and (d)

Publication and Maintenance of Medication List

prominently featuredstraightforward

Within one year of enactment, the FAA Administrator must publish and maintain a publicly available website list of medications approved for airmen and air traffic control specialists. This list must be updated at least annually and whenever relevant FAA medical certification policy changes, including updates to the Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners.

Section 2(c)

Requirements for List Content and Dissemination

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section details the specific requirements for the medication list. It must be developed in consultation with various aviation stakeholders (e.g., pilots, air traffic controllers, training schools, medical associations), include allowed medications, contra-indications, FAA review requirements, "Do Not Issue" lists, and information for doctors to contact the FAA. It must be user-friendly, accessible, and available on MedXPress.

Section 2(e)

Savings Clause

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This clause clarifies that the FAA Administrator is not liable if an individual relies on the published list and experiences adverse reactions, causes harm, or is deemed ineligible for medical certification. This protects the FAA from liability arising from individuals' use of medications or their medical certification outcomes.

FOUND

This clause states that the FAA Administrator is not liable if an airman, air traffic control specialist, or applicant relies on the published medication list and subsequently experiences an adverse medical reaction, causes harm, or is deemed ineligible for medical certification.

Section 2(e)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for liability limitations, often placed at the end of sections to clarify legal boundaries without interrupting the main policy directives.

Case for: Supporters argue this clause is necessary to enable the FAA to publish comprehensive medical guidance without fear of excessive litigation, thereby encouraging greater transparency.

Case against: Critics might contend that while some protection is warranted, such a broad waiver could potentially reduce the FAA's incentive to ensure the list is meticulously accurate and updated, placing a greater burden of risk on individuals.

Estimated impact: Limits potential future legal claims against the FAA related to the medication list, potentially saving taxpayer funds from litigation costs.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this