The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
TransformativeWhat changed in REPORTED TO SENATEcompared with INTRODUCED IN SENATE (Dec 3, 2025)
See full diff

A meaningful expansion of scope. v2 retains all provisions from v1 regarding pension-linked emergency savings accounts, including increased contribution limits and expanded eligibility. However, v2 significantly broadens the bill's focus by adding a new section that introduces substantial appropriations for the Employee Ownership Initiative Grant Program, thereby encompassing a new policy area.

S. 3333·119th Congress·Introduced Dec 3, 2025

Emergency Savings Enhancement Act of 2025

Reported To SenateTaxationOmnibus
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN]
Committees
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 5, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to enhance financial security by expanding access to and increasing the utility of pension-linked emergency savings accounts, while also providing substantial, long-term federal funding for programs that promote employee ownership.

What it actually does

This bill modifies the eligibility requirements for pension-linked emergency savings accounts (PLESAs) by broadening the definition of an 'eligible participant' and increases the maximum contribution limit for these accounts from $2,500 to $5,000. Additionally, it significantly expands and extends appropriations for the Employee Ownership Initiative Grant Program, including both discretionary authorizations and mandatory funding over several fiscal years, with an inflation adjustment mechanism.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill will significantly improve financial resilience for American workers by making it easier for more individuals to build emergency savings through their workplace retirement plans. They contend that increasing the contribution limit allows for more robust savings, and the expanded funding for employee ownership initiatives will foster economic growth and create more equitable wealth distribution.

Opponents contend

Critics might raise concerns about the appropriateness of combining distinct policy areas—emergency savings and employee ownership—into a single bill, suggesting it could obscure scrutiny of individual provisions. Some may also question the long-term fiscal commitment of the new mandatory appropriations for the grant program, or whether linking emergency savings to retirement plans might create confusion or unintended incentives regarding long-term retirement planning.

The bill is relatively short and clearly structured, making it accessible for an informed reader to review and understand its provisions within a reasonable timeframe.

Section 1

Short Title

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes the official short title of the Act as the 'Emergency Savings Enhancement Act of 2025'. This title provides a concise and common reference for the legislation.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral PublicImpactClarity and identification of the legislationMechanismScale

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that a clear and descriptive short title helps the public and policymakers easily identify and discuss the legislation's primary intent.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the short title of a bill, as it serves a purely administrative and descriptive purpose.

Tradeoffs

None apparent, as this is a standard legislative practice.

Section 2(1)

Expanded Eligibility for Pension-Linked Emergency Savings Accounts (ERISA)

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision amends Section 801(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to broaden the definition of an 'eligible participant' for pension-linked emergency savings accounts (PLESAs). Previously, there might have been more restrictive federal definitions; now, an individual is eligible if they meet 'any age, service, and other eligibility requirements of the plan,' giving more flexibility to plan sponsors and potentially allowing more workers to participate.

Section 2(2)(A) and Section 3(b)

Increased Contribution Limit for Pension-Linked Emergency Savings Accounts

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends both ERISA (Section 801(d)(1)(A)(i)) and the Internal Revenue Code (Section 402A(e)(3)(A)(i)) to increase the maximum allowable contribution to a pension-linked emergency savings account (PLESA) from $2,500 to $5,000. This doubles the amount individuals can save in these tax-advantaged accounts.

Section 3(a)

Expanded Eligibility for Pension-Linked Emergency Savings Accounts (IRC)

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section amends Paragraph (2) of Section 402A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It redefines 'eligible participant' for defined contribution plans offering PLESAs to mean an individual who meets the plan's age, service, and other eligibility requirements, 'without regard to whether the individual is otherwise a participant in such plan.' This change aligns the tax code with the ERISA amendment, ensuring that the broader eligibility for PLESAs is recognized for tax purposes.

Section 4

Effective Date of Emergency Savings Account Amendments

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section specifies that the amendments made by Sections 2 and 3, which relate to the eligibility and contribution limits for pension-linked emergency savings accounts, shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026. This provides a lead time for employers, plan administrators, and relevant agencies to implement the necessary changes.

Section 5(1)

Inflation Adjustment for Employee Ownership Initiative Grants

buried in fine printstraightforward

This provision amends Section 346(d)(6) of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 by adding a new subparagraph (F). It mandates that for fiscal years 2030 through 2035, the amount of grants for the Employee Ownership Initiative Grant Program shall be adjusted by the percent increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) for the most recent 12-month period. This ensures that the real value of the grants is maintained against inflation over time.

Section 5(2) and (3)

New Appropriations for Employee Ownership Initiative Grant Program

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section significantly amends the funding structure for the Employee Ownership Initiative Grant Program under the SECURE 2.0 Act. It authorizes new discretionary appropriations ranging from $4 million in FY2025 to $22 million in FY2035, and also provides new mandatory appropriations ranging from $8 million in FY2027 to $18 million in FY2032. These funds are designated for grants to promote employee ownership, dramatically increasing the program's financial resources.

Section 5(4)

Program Administration Funding for Employee Ownership Initiative

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision allows the Secretary (presumably of Labor, as per the SECURE 2.0 Act context) to reserve up to 5 percent of the total amounts appropriated for the Employee Ownership Initiative Grant Program for administrative expenses. These funds can be used for planning, oversight, management, monitoring, personnel, training, and other administrative activities necessary to carry out the grant program effectively.

FOUND

This 'conforming amendment' strikes clause (ix) from subparagraph (A) of section 402A(e)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and modifies clauses (vii) and (viii) to adjust punctuation. Clause (ix) previously imposed a limitation on penalty-free withdrawals from pension-linked emergency savings accounts, restricting them to no more than four per year.

Section 3(c)

Why it matters:While 'conforming amendments' are often technical, striking a substantive limitation on withdrawals can have a significant policy effect. It might be phrased this way to streamline the legislative text and avoid drawing undue attention to the removal of a restriction that could be perceived as beneficial to consumers.

Case for: Proponents argue that removing the four-withdrawal-per-year limit makes PLESAs more genuinely useful for managing multiple, smaller emergencies throughout the year without penalty. This flexibility enhances the utility of the account as a true emergency fund, aligning with the goal of improving financial resilience.

Case against: Critics might argue that removing the withdrawal limit could encourage more frequent, less critical withdrawals, potentially depleting the emergency savings account too quickly or making it less effective for larger, unforeseen events. This could also increase administrative complexity for plan sponsors tracking withdrawals.

Estimated impact: This change significantly enhances the liquidity and flexibility of pension-linked emergency savings accounts for participants, making them more adaptable to varied financial needs throughout a year.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
  • Riders
  • Tactical maneuvers
  • Process critique
  • Transparency
Ask Ledger AI about this