The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
Back to REPORTED TO SENATE
Comparev1INTRODUCED IN SENATEDec 16→v2REPORTED TO SENATEJul 23
SubstantiveINTRODUCED IN SENATE → REPORTED TO SENATE

What changed between these versions

A complete substitute amendment, v2 significantly modifies the Carson City Public Land Correction Act by adjusting land acreages and map references, clarifying environmental responsibilities for both the Secretary and the City, and extending a public safety construction deadline. Most notably, v2 fundamentally alters the disposition of proceeds from land sales by narrowing eligible uses and revises the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to change how Carson City can engage with third parties for land use, shifting from potential sales/leases to operational agreements for recreational facilities.

Overview

V2 constitutes a complete substitute amendment, resulting in extensive changes throughout the bill, affecting nearly every section. · V2 refines and clarifies some aspects of land conveyance, narrows the scope of how proceeds from land sales can be used, and fundamentally restructures the City's ability to engage with third parties regarding certain federal lands.

The most significant changes in v2 involve the disposition of proceeds from land sales, drastically narrowing the categories for which funds from the Carson City Special Account can be used, and a fundamental restructuring of how Carson City can enter into agreements with third parties for land use, shifting from potential sales or leases to operational and maintenance agreements for recreational facilities. Additionally, v2 adjusts specific land acreages and map references, clarifies environmental responsibilities for both the Secretary and the City, and extends the timeline for a public safety condition. The core purpose of facilitating land conveyances and disposals in Carson City remains consistent.

+

Major additions

+
Section 3(e)(2)

This new provision clarifies that nothing in the Act requires Carson City to remediate hazardous substances, waste, or remove improvements from the approximately 1,270 acres of Federal land conveyed under Section 3(a) after the conveyance date.

This addition explicitly limits the environmental liability of Carson City regarding the primary land conveyance, potentially reducing future costs and legal obligations for the City. It shifts the burden of pre-existing environmental issues away from the City post-conveyance.

+
Section 4(d)

This new subsection introduces a reversion clause for the approximately 0.5 acres of Federal land conveyed for a street connector. If the land ceases to be used for roadway construction, it shall revert to the United States at the Secretary's discretion.

This adds a condition subsequent to the street connector conveyance, ensuring the land is used for its intended purpose and providing the federal government with a mechanism to reclaim the land if the use changes. This was not present for this specific conveyance in v1.

+
Section 4(f)(2)

This new provision clarifies that nothing in the Act requires Carson City to remediate hazardous substances, waste, or remove improvements from the approximately 0.5 acres of Federal land conveyed under Section 4(a) after the conveyance date.

Similar to Section 3(e)(2), this explicitly limits the environmental liability of Carson City for the street connector land, potentially reducing future costs and legal obligations for the City.

+
Section 5(d)(3)

This new provision states that upon disposal of the approximately 356 acres of Federal land, the City shall retain "any other valid existing right held by the City" on the date of disposal, in addition to specific easements.

This broadens the protections for Carson City's existing rights on the disposed federal land, ensuring that any unlisted valid rights are also preserved.

+
Section 6(b)(2)

This new provision adds approximately 24 acres of land, depicted as "Category 6" on the Map, to the land that the City may offer to convey to the Secretary of the Interior.

This expands the amount of land the City can transfer to the federal government, potentially facilitating more comprehensive land management or development plans for Carson City.

+
Section 6(e)(3)

This new provision states that upon disposal of the land conveyed to the Secretary under Section 6(c), the City shall retain "any other valid existing right held by the City" on the date of disposal, in addition to specific easements.

Similar to Section 5(d)(3), this broadens the protections for Carson City's existing rights on the disposed land that was transferred from the City to the federal government.

+
Section 8(a)

This amendment to the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (OPLMA) replaces subparagraph (C) of Section 2601(b)(4). The new language specifies that land described in paragraph (2)(B)(iii) shall be managed by the City for undeveloped open space, uses related to Carson City Airport operations, and recreation or other public purposes consistent with the Recreation and Public Purposes Act.

This clarifies and potentially broadens the permissible uses for specific lands previously conveyed to the City under OPLMA, providing more flexibility for City management while maintaining public benefit.

+
Section 8(b)

This amendment to OPLMA adds a new subparagraph (E) to Section 2601(b)(4). This new (E) allows the City to enter into agreements with third parties for the operations and maintenance of specific recreational facilities (Capitol City Gun Club, Centennial Park, Eagle Valley Golf Course) or other recreational/public purposes on the land described in paragraph (2)(B). It explicitly states that no appraisal is required for such agreements and outlines the disposition of any net profits from for-profit entities.

This is a fundamental shift in how the City can leverage these lands. V1's proposed (E) allowed for sale, lease, or conveyance for economic development, requiring fair market value. V2's (E) focuses on operational agreements for recreational uses, waives appraisal requirements, and specifies profit disposition. This provides more flexibility for recreational partnerships without requiring full transfer of ownership or lease, potentially making it easier to maintain and operate these facilities.

−

Deletions

−
Section 8(a) (original)

V1 proposed adding a new subparagraph (E) to Section 2601(b)(4) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009. This provision would have allowed Carson City to sell, lease, or otherwise convey all or a portion of certain land to third parties for economic development, recreation, or other public purposes, with a condition that any sale be for not less than fair market value.

The deletion of this provision removes the explicit authority for Carson City to sell or lease these specific lands to third parties for economic development or other purposes, particularly the requirement for fair market value. This changes the potential for direct commercialization or transfer of ownership of these lands.

~

Modifications

~
Section 2(3)
The name and date of the reference map have been updated.

This change indicates that the specific land parcels and boundaries referenced throughout the bill are based on a more recent and potentially revised map, which could reflect minor boundary adjustments or updated land classifications.

Before

The Map was defined as "Carson City OPLMA Lands 2025" and dated December 11, 2025.

After

The Map is now defined as "Carson City OPLMA Lands" and dated March 3, 2026.

~
Section 3(a)
The acreage for this conveyance has been slightly reduced, and the label used on the map for this land has been updated.

This results in a slightly smaller amount of land (18 acres less) being conveyed to Carson City under this section. The change in map label provides a new identifier for the land.

Before

The Secretary was to convey approximately 1,288 acres of Federal land depicted as "Lands to acquire" on the Map.

After

The Secretary is to convey approximately 1,270 acres of Federal land depicted as "Category 1" on the Map.

~
Section 3(e)
Addition of specific environmental responsibility clauses for the main land conveyance, including a new explicit clarification of the City's non-responsibility post-conveyance.

This clarifies the environmental liabilities for both the Secretary and the City regarding the primary land conveyance, explicitly stating that the City is not obligated for remediation or removal of improvements post-conveyance, which reduces potential future costs and legal burdens for the City.

Before

V1 did not include an environmental response and restoration clause for the main conveyance in Section 3. It only had a similar clause in Section 4(e) for the street connector.

After

V2 adds a new subsection (e) to Section 3, detailing the environmental responsibilities. It states the Secretary shall meet disclosure requirements but is not required to remediate, abate, or remove improvements (3(e)(1)). It also adds a new provision (3(e)(2)) clarifying that the City is not required to remediate, abate, or remove improvements after the conveyance.

~
Section 4(a)
The acreage for this conveyance has been slightly increased, and the label used on the map for this land has been updated.

This results in a slightly larger amount of land (0.05 acres more) being conveyed for the street connector. The change in map label provides a new identifier for the land.

Before

The Secretary was to convey approximately 0.45 acres of Federal land depicted as "Lands to acquire" on the Map.

After

The Secretary is to convey approximately 0.5 acres of Federal land depicted as "Category 5" on the Map.

~
Section 4(b)
The wording changed from "expansion" to "construction."

While subtle, "construction" might imply a new roadway or a more significant build-out than merely "expansion," potentially broadening the scope of the project for which the land can be used.

Before

The City was to use the Federal land conveyed for the "expansion of a roadway."

After

The City is to use the Federal land conveyed for the "construction of a roadway."

~
Section 4(e)
The deadline for constructing the crosswalk has been significantly extended.

This provides Carson City with a much longer timeframe (from 3 months to 2 years) to complete the required public safety infrastructure, offering greater flexibility in project planning and execution.

Before

The City was required to construct a crosswalk across South Curry Street not later than 90 days after the date of conveyance.

After

The City is required to construct a crosswalk across South Curry Street not later than 2 years after the date of conveyance.

~
Section 4(f)
Renumbering and addition of a new explicit clarification of the City's non-responsibility post-conveyance.

This clarifies the environmental liabilities for the City regarding the street connector land, explicitly stating that the City is not obligated for remediation or removal of improvements post-conveyance, which reduces potential future costs and legal burdens for the City.

Before

V1 included a subsection (e) for environmental response and restoration for this section, stating the Secretary shall meet disclosure requirements but is not otherwise required to remediate, abate, or remove improvements.

After

V2 renumbers this to subsection (f) and expands it to include a new provision (f)(2) clarifying that the City is not required to remediate, abate, or remove improvements after the conveyance.

~
Section 5(b)
The acreage for this disposal has been slightly reduced, and the label used on the map for this land has been updated.

This results in a slightly smaller amount of land (4 acres less) being available for federal disposal. The change in map label provides a new identifier for the land.

Before

The Federal land for disposal was approximately 360 acres depicted as "BLM Owned lands to dispose" on the Map.

After

The Federal land for disposal is approximately 356 acres depicted as "Category 2" on the Map.

~
Section 6(b)(1)
The acreage for this transfer has been slightly increased, and the label used on the map for this land has been updated.

This results in a slightly larger amount of land (1 acre more) being transferred from Carson City to the federal government under this specific category.

Before

The land for transfer from the City to the Secretary of the Interior was approximately 20 acres depicted as "Lands to Dispose" on the Map.

After

This land is now described as approximately 21 acres depicted as "Category 3" on the Map.

~
Section 6(c)
The scope of land the Secretary is required to dispose of has been narrowed.

This means only the 21 acres (Category 3) are subject to mandatory disposal by the Secretary, while the newly added 24 acres (Category 6) are not explicitly mandated for sale, providing more flexibility for the federal government regarding the disposition of that additional land.

Before

The Secretary of the Interior was to conduct sales of "the land conveyed to the Secretary of the Interior under subsection (a)" (which included all land offered by the City).

After

The Secretary of the Interior is to conduct sales to qualified bidders of "the land conveyed to the Secretary of the Interior described in subsection (b)(1)."

~
Section 7(a)
The mechanism for handling proceeds has been changed from direct deposit into the Account to disposal in accordance with specific OPLMA provisions.

This changes the legal framework governing the proceeds, potentially affecting how and when funds become available and are managed, tying them more directly to the existing OPLMA framework for disposition.

Before

Proceeds from sales under sections 3 through 6 "shall be deposited in the Account."

After

Proceeds from sales under sections 3 through 6 "shall be disposed of in accordance with subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) of section 2601(e) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009."

~
Section 7(b)
The eligible uses for funds from the Account have been significantly narrowed, removing 5 of the 8 previously listed categories.

This substantially restricts how the proceeds from land sales can be utilized, eliminating funding for several environmental, infrastructure, and educational initiatives previously supported by the Account. This will likely reduce the scope of projects that can be funded in Carson City.

Before

Amounts in the Account were available for 8 specific purposes, including wildlife habitat, hazardous fuels reduction, wilderness protection, capital improvements, and educational purposes.

After

Amounts in the Account are now available for only 3 specific purposes: reimbursement of Secretary's costs, reimbursement of City's costs, and acquisition of environmentally sensitive land.

~
Section 7(c)
The provision for the Account to earn interest has been removed, and the section title changed.

The Account will no longer accrue interest, potentially reducing the total funds available over time for the remaining eligible purposes.

Before

Amounts deposited in the Account "shall earn interest in an amount determined by the Secretary of the Treasury" and "may be expended by the Secretary."

After

This section is now titled "Expenditures From the Account" and states "Amounts deposited in the Account may be expended by the Secretary, in accordance with this section." The clause about earning interest is removed.

~
Section 8(c)
This is a consistent modification to update the cross-reference in the reversion clause, but the content of the (E) being referenced is different between v1 and v2.

The reversion clause now applies to the new type of third-party agreements (operations and maintenance) introduced in v2's Section 8(b), rather than the sale/lease provisions proposed in v1. This ensures that if the conditions of the new operational agreements are violated, the land can revert.

Before

V1 amended OPLMA 2601(b)(4) by inserting a new subparagraph (E) and then amended 2601(b)(5) by striking "(C), or (D)" and inserting "(C), (D), or (E)".

After

V2 also amends OPLMA 2601(b)(5) by striking "(C), or (D)" and inserting "(C), (D), or (E)".

Scope

Fundamental restructuring — The changes are scattered throughout the bill, affecting definitions, specific land conveyances, environmental clauses, and significantly altering the disposition of proceeds and amendments to existing law. — V2 represents a meaningful change in policy direction regarding the utilization of proceeds from land sales, shifting from a broad range of community and environmental projects to a much narrower focus on administrative costs and environmentally sensitive land acquisition. It also fundamentally reorients the City's ability to engage with third parties on certain lands, moving away from potential sales/leases towards operational agreements for recreational facilities. — The changes interact directly with the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, specifically altering how proceeds from land sales are managed and how Carson City can enter into agreements for certain previously conveyed lands. The updated map reference affects all land descriptions throughout the bill.

Impact analysis

Carson City, Nevada (as a municipal entity)

Gains (reduced liability, increased flexibility, broader rights, new land transfer option), but also experiences a narrowing of funding options and a procedural shift in land management options.

The City receives slightly less land in one conveyance (Sec 3(a)) but slightly more in another (Sec 4(a)). It gains explicit protection from environmental remediation liabilities post-conveyance (Sec 3(e)(2), Sec 4(f)(2)). It also gains more flexibility in the timeline for crosswalk construction (Sec 4(e)). The City can transfer more land to the federal government (Sec 6(b)(2)) and retains broader existing rights on disposed/transferred lands (Sec 5(d)(3), Sec 6(e)(3)). However, the eligible uses for proceeds from land sales are significantly narrowed, and the mechanism for third-party engagement on certain OPLMA lands shifts from potential sales/leases to operational agreements.

Federal Government (Secretary of the Interior/Agriculture)

Experiences a narrowing of funding options and a slight increase in discretion for land management.

The Secretary's environmental disclosure responsibilities are clarified (Sec 3(e)(1), Sec 4(f)(1)). The Secretary gains discretion over the reversion of street connector land (Sec 4(d)). The Secretary is mandated to dispose of a narrower subset of land transferred from the City (Sec 6(c)). The funds available to the Secretary from the Carson City Special Account are significantly restricted in their use (Sec 7(b)).

Environmental conservation projects in Carson City (e.g., wildlife habitat, hazardous fuels reduction, wilderness protection)

Loses (funding source removed).

Funds from the Carson City Special Account are no longer available for these types of projects.

Capital improvement projects by Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service in Carson City

Loses (funding source removed).

Funds from the Carson City Special Account are no longer available for these projects.

Educational purposes of Carson City

Loses (funding source removed).

Funds from the Carson City Special Account are no longer available for these purposes.

Third parties interested in operating or maintaining recreational facilities on OPLMA lands (e.g., Capitol City Gun Club, Centennial Park, Eagle Valley Golf Course)

Gains (new, more accessible mechanism for engagement).

V2 creates a new mechanism (agreements for operations and maintenance) for these entities to engage with Carson City regarding specific recreational lands, explicitly waiving appraisal requirements and outlining profit disposition. V1's proposed amendment would have allowed for outright sale or lease.

Developers or entities interested in purchasing/leasing OPLMA lands for economic development

Loses (opportunity for land acquisition removed).

V1's proposed amendment allowing for sale or lease of OPLMA lands to third parties for economic development is removed.

Ask Ledger AI about this