The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 3627·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 13, 2026

Pregnant Students’ Rights Act

IntroducedEducationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL]
Last action
Jan 27, 2026

Bottom line

The bill mandates that colleges and universities inform students about their rights and available support for pregnancy and parenting, specifically for those choosing to carry a baby to term.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of higher education (IHEs) that participate in federal student aid programs to disseminate specific information to prospective and enrolled students regarding the rights, accommodations, and resources available to pregnant students who choose to carry a baby to term. This information must include on-campus and community resources, available accommodations, and procedures for filing Title IX complaints related to pregnancy discrimination.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill ensures pregnant students are fully aware of their existing rights under Title IX and the resources available to them, helping them to continue their education while pregnant or parenting. They contend it promotes a supportive environment for pregnant students, preventing discrimination and ensuring equitable access to educational opportunities without forcing difficult choices between education and family.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while supporting pregnant students is important, this bill's specific framing, emphasizing carrying a baby to term, could be seen as promoting a particular viewpoint on reproductive choices. Some may also contend that existing Title IX guidance already covers these requirements, and this bill adds an unnecessary federal mandate that could be burdensome for IHEs to implement or could be interpreted as limiting the scope of Title IX protections.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2, adding subsection (n) to 20 U.S.C. 1092

Mandatory Information Dissemination for Pregnant Students

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires all colleges and universities that receive federal funding under the Higher Education Act to inform their students about the rights, protections, and accommodations available to pregnant students who choose to carry their pregnancy to term and parent their child. The information must cover on-campus and community resources, specific accommodations, and how to file a complaint if they believe their Title IX rights have been violated due to their decision to carry a baby to term.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupInstitutions of Higher Education (IHEs)ImpactIncreased administrative burden and compliance requirementsMechanismMandate to create, compile, and disseminate specific information through multiple channels.ScaleNationwide for all IHEs participating in Title IV programs.
GroupPregnant students and students who may become pregnantImpactImproved awareness of rights, accommodations, and resourcesMechanismDirect receipt of information via email, handbooks, orientations, and website access.ScalePotentially all female students and other pregnant individuals enrolled or considering enrollment.
GroupDepartment of EducationImpactPotential increase in Title IX complaints related to pregnancy discriminationMechanismExplicit instruction on how to file complaints with the Department.ScaleModerate increase in caseload.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue this provision is crucial for ensuring that pregnant students are not disadvantaged in their educational pursuits. By clearly outlining resources and rights, it empowers students to make informed decisions and access necessary support, fostering an inclusive academic environment. It reinforces existing Title IX protections by making them more visible and actionable.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that this provision, while seemingly beneficial, is overly prescriptive and could lead to a narrow interpretation of Title IX's protections for pregnant students. They may also contend that it places an unfunded mandate on IHEs, requiring them to dedicate resources to information dissemination that may already be covered by existing policies or general Title IX guidance, potentially diverting resources from other student support services.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the goal of empowering pregnant students with information against the potential administrative burden on IHEs. There's also a tension between ensuring comprehensive awareness of rights and avoiding the perception of promoting a specific reproductive choice, given the explicit focus on 'carrying a baby to term'.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this