The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 3641·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 14, 2026

No Relief for Allies of Dictators Act of 2026

IntroducedInternational AffairsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 14, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to increase pressure on authoritarian regimes in Latin America by expanding visa restrictions and inadmissibility criteria for their current and former officials and associates, including family members.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Secretary of State to revoke visas or impose restrictions on current and former officials of the Chavez/Maduro (Venezuela), Castro/Diaz-Canel (Cuba), Ortega/Sandinista (Nicaragua), and Morales (Bolivia) regimes. It also targets individuals responsible for human rights violations or undermining democracy in these countries, as well as their spouses and children, and those identified under specific Executive Orders related to Venezuela.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill strengthens U.S. foreign policy by directly targeting individuals who support or benefit from authoritarian regimes, thereby promoting human rights and democratic values in the region. They contend that restricting travel and access to the U.S. for these individuals and their families will serve as a powerful deterrent and a consequence for their actions.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that such broad visa restrictions, especially those extending to spouses and and children, could be seen as overly punitive or counterproductive, potentially alienating populations rather than isolating regimes. They might also raise concerns about the potential for unintended humanitarian consequences or the practical challenges of implementation and verification.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a reader to quickly understand its core provisions.

Section 2(a) and 2(b)

Mandatory Visa Revocation and Restrictions for Individuals Associated with Authoritarian Regimes

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of State to revoke visas or impose restrictions on current and former officials of the Chavez/Maduro (Venezuela), Castro/Diaz-Canel (Cuba), Ortega/Sandinista (Nicaragua), and Morales (Bolivia) regimes. It also applies to individuals who act on behalf of, aid in repression by, or assist these regimes, as well as those responsible for human rights violations or undermining democracy in these countries. Spouses and children of such individuals are also subject to these restrictions.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCurrent and former officials of specified regimes in Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, and BoliviaImpactDirect travel restrictions, inadmissibility to the U.S., visa revocationMechanismSecretary of State determination based on association with regimes or actionsScaleIndividual, but potentially affecting a significant number of people across four nations
GroupSpouses and children of the above-mentioned individualsImpactSecondary travel restrictions, inadmissibility to the U.S., visa revocationMechanismFamilial relationship to a primary targetScaleIndividual, extending the impact to family units

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly targets the support networks of authoritarian leaders, increasing personal consequences for those who enable or benefit from oppressive regimes. They believe it sends a strong message that the U.S. will not tolerate human rights abuses or democratic erosion.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that extending restrictions to spouses and children could be overly broad, potentially penalizing individuals who are not directly involved in the objectionable activities. They may also argue that such measures could be perceived as collective punishment, potentially fueling anti-U.S. sentiment.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between maximizing pressure on regimes by targeting their associates and their families, versus the potential for humanitarian concerns or alienating individuals who may not be directly complicit in abuses.

Section 2(c)(1)

Inadmissibility to the United States and Expedited Removal

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision specifies that individuals subject to the visa restrictions are inadmissible to the United States, ineligible for visas or other entry documentation, and ineligible for admission or parole. It also mandates the revocation of any existing visas and subjects these individuals to expedited removal from the U.S.

Section 2(c)(2)

Case-by-Case Determination for UN Headquarters Visitors

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision allows for a case-by-case determination by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, regarding the applicability of visa restrictions to individuals traveling to the United States to visit the headquarters of the United Nations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this