The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 3673·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 15, 2026

Roadside Pollinator Program Amendments Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 15, 2026

Bottom line

The bill expands and enhances a federal program supporting pollinator habitats along roadsides by increasing funding, broadening eligibility to nonprofits, and refining consultation processes to encourage more widespread and impactful conservation efforts.

What it actually does

This bill amends Section 332 of title 23, United States Code, to expand eligibility for the pollinator-friendly practices program to include certain nonprofit organizations, clarifies consultation requirements with Indian Tribes, increases the maximum grant amount for individual projects, and reauthorizes the program with significantly increased annual funding from fiscal years 2026 through 2031.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is crucial for addressing declining pollinator populations, which are vital for agriculture and ecosystem health. Expanding eligibility to qualified nonprofits and substantially increasing funding will allow more projects to be undertaken, fostering biodiversity and sustainable land management along transportation corridors, ultimately benefiting both the environment and the economy.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while pollinator health is important, increasing federal spending on roadside programs, especially with a significant funding increase, may not be the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars compared to other conservation efforts or infrastructure priorities. Some might also raise concerns about potential administrative burdens with a broader grantee pool or question the overall effectiveness of roadside habitats compared to larger, contiguous conservation areas.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(1)

Expand Eligibility for Pollinator Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends subsection (b) of section 332 of title 23, United States Code, to include certain nonprofit organizations as eligible entities for the pollinator-friendly practices program. Specifically, it allows 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofits to apply for grants, alongside existing eligible entities such as State departments of transportation, Federal land management agencies, and Indian Tribes.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNonprofit organizations (specifically 501(c)(3) tax-exempt)ImpactGain eligibility to apply for federal grants for pollinator-friendly roadside projects.MechanismStatutory amendment to eligibility criteria.ScaleBroadens the pool of potential implementers for the program.
GroupPollinator populationsImpactPotential increase in habitat creation and maintenance.MechanismMore entities implementing pollinator-friendly practices.ScalePositive, localized to project areas.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that including qualified nonprofit organizations will leverage their expertise, community engagement, and capacity to implement pollinator-friendly projects, particularly in areas where state agencies or tribal governments may have limited resources or specific focus. This expansion can lead to more diverse and effective conservation efforts.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against expanding eligibility to qualified nonprofits for conservation programs, as it generally enhances program reach. However, some might express concerns about potential administrative oversight challenges with a broader range of grantees.

Tradeoffs

The tradeoff involves balancing the benefits of broader participation and increased project implementation against potential increases in administrative complexity for federal agencies managing a larger and more diverse grantee pool.

Section 2(2)

Refine Consultation with Indian Tribes

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section amends subsection (d) of section 332 to clarify and refine consultation requirements for Indian Tribes. It specifies that consultation should occur with "Indian Tribes described in subsection (b)(2), the Tribal land of which is located 50 miles or less from a project or practice proposed to be included in the plan." It also adds a clarification that no additional consultation is required beyond the initial plan development.

Section 2(3)

Increase Maximum Grant Amount

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends subsection (e)(2)(B) of section 332 to increase the maximum amount for a single grant awarded under the pollinator-friendly practices program. The cap is raised from $150,000 to $500,000, allowing for significantly larger individual project funding.

Section 2(4)

Reauthorize and Increase Program Funding

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends subsection (l)(1) of section 332 to reauthorize the pollinator-friendly practices program for fiscal years 2026 through 2031. Crucially, it increases the annual appropriation for the program from $2,000,000 to $5,000,000 for each of those fiscal years, representing a significant boost in overall program funding.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this