What changed between these versions
v2 introduces a new funding limitation for Regional Ocean Partnerships, prohibiting the use of funds for regulatory proposals or compliance programs. It also adjusts the reauthorization amounts for fiscal years 2028-2031 to be slightly lower than initially proposed in v1, and includes several technical corrections and minor substantive changes to definitions and reporting language.
Overview
v2 contains a handful of specific changes to the reauthorization of Regional Ocean Partnerships, including a significant new funding limitation and adjustments to appropriations. Several minor technical and clarifying amendments are also present. · v2 refines and clarifies existing provisions, revises the financial appropriations, and introduces a new restriction on the use of reauthorized funds, thereby narrowing the scope of permissible activities for Regional Ocean Partnerships.
The most significant change in v2 is the addition of a new subsection (j)(4) which explicitly prohibits Regional Ocean Partnerships from using reauthorized funds for developing regulatory proposals, model regulations, or compliance programs. Additionally, the proposed appropriations for fiscal years 2028 through 2031 have been reduced compared to v1's figures. Several technical corrections, such as capitalization adjustments and minor wording changes, are also included, alongside the removal of Vermont from a list of non-coastal states for certain partnership definitions.
Major additions
v2 adds a new subsection (j)(4) titled 'Funding limitation.' This provision states that no amounts made available under this subsection may be used by a Regional Ocean Partnership, including any Regional Coastal Partnership or Regional Great Lakes Partnership, to develop any regulatory proposal, model regulation, or compliance program.
This addition significantly restricts the operational scope of Regional Ocean Partnerships by explicitly prohibiting the use of federal funds for certain regulatory-related activities. It imposes a new constraint on how these partnerships can utilize their reauthorized funding, potentially shifting their focus away from regulatory development.
Modifications
This is a minor, largely cosmetic change to the official name of the Act, with no direct operative impact on the reauthorization or activities of the partnerships.
Before
The short title of the Act was 'Regional Ocean Partnerships Reauthorization Act of 2026'.
After
The short title of the Act is 'Regional Ocean Partnerships Reauthorization Act', removing the year '2026'.
This is a technical, grammatical correction that clarifies the consistent use of 'coastal state' without altering its meaning or application.
Before
Subsection (a)(2) referred to 'the term `Coastal state' in section'.
After
Subsection (a)(2) now refers to 'the term `coastal state' in section'.
This modification clarifies that the scope of activities includes both regulatory and enforcement aspects, potentially broadening the types of actions or considerations for Regional Ocean Partnerships.
Before
Subsection (b)(2)(D) referred to 'regulatory' actions.
After
Subsection (b)(2)(D) now refers to 'regulatory or enforcement' actions.
This is a substantive change in geographic terminology, altering the specific body of water referenced in the definition of a 'Regional Coastal Partnership'. This could have implications for the geographic scope or focus of such partnerships.
Before
Subsection (b)(3)(A) referred to the 'Gulf of Mexico'.
After
Subsection (b)(3)(A) now refers to the 'Gulf of America'.
By removing Vermont from this exclusionary list, v2 effectively allows Vermont to be considered a 'coastal state' for the purposes of forming or participating in a 'Regional Great Lakes Partnership', potentially expanding its eligibility or classification under the Act.
Before
Subsection (b)(3)(B) included 'Vermont,' in a list of states that are not considered a 'coastal state' for the purpose of a 'Regional Great Lakes Partnership'.
After
Subsection (b)(3)(B) removes 'Vermont,' from the list of states that are not considered a 'coastal state' for the purpose of a 'Regional Great Lakes Partnership'.
This is a technical, grammatical correction that clarifies the consistent use of 'coastal State' without altering its meaning or application.
Before
Subsection (c)(1) referred to 'coastal state' with inconsistent capitalization.
After
Subsection (c)(1) now consistently refers to 'coastal State' with a capital 'S'.
This change broadens the scope of 'changes' that Regional Ocean Partnerships are to address, removing a specific limitation on the origin of those changes. It implies a more comprehensive approach to all types of environmental or oceanic changes.
Before
Subsection (f)(2)(B) referred to 'natural and human-induced' changes.
After
Subsection (f)(2)(B) now refers simply to 'changes', omitting 'natural and human-induced'.
This is a technical correction to align the reference with the modified short title of the Act, with no direct operative impact on the reporting requirements.
Before
Subsection (g)(1) referenced 'the date of enactment of the Regional Ocean Partnerships Reauthorization Act of 2026,'.
After
Subsection (g)(1) now references 'the date of enactment of the Regional Ocean Partnerships Reauthorization Act,'.
This is a minor grammatical clarification, emphasizing that the subsequent requirements apply to every report rather than a singular, undefined report, ensuring consistent reporting expectations.
Before
Subsection (g)(2) began with 'The report'.
After
Subsection (g)(2) now begins with 'Each report'.
This modification directly impacts the financial resources available to Regional Ocean Partnerships, providing slightly lower authorized funding levels for the specified fiscal years compared to v1's proposal. It also updates the reauthorization period to reflect current fiscal years.
Before
Subsection (j)(1) provided specific appropriations for fiscal years 2023-2027, including $11,572,444 for FY2028, $11,688,168 for FY2029, $11,805,050 for FY2030, and $11,923,101 for FY2031.
After
Subsection (j)(1) strikes the appropriations for FY2023-2025, redesignates existing subparagraphs, and sets new appropriations for fiscal years 2028-2031 at $10,630,812 for FY2028, $10,743,428 for FY2029, $10,858,296 for FY2030, and $10,975,462 for FY2031.
This modification updates the effective period for the reauthorization, aligning it with the new appropriations schedule and extending the reauthorization through fiscal year 2031.
Before
Subsection (j)(3) referred to the period '2023 through 2027'.
After
Subsection (j)(3) now refers to the period '2026 through 2031'.
Scope
Meaningful expansion or narrowing — The changes are scattered throughout various subsections of Section 10202 of the base Act, covering definitions, reporting, and appropriations, but are all contained within the single amending section of the bill. — v2 represents a refinement of the existing policy direction, with a notable new restriction on funding use. While the core purpose of reauthorizing Regional Ocean Partnerships remains, the added funding limitation introduces a new policy constraint on their activities. — The new funding limitation in subsection (j)(4) directly interacts with and restricts the use of all funds authorized under subsection (j)(1), impacting the operational flexibility of Regional Ocean Partnerships. The change to Vermont's status affects the definition of 'Regional Great Lakes Partnership' and potentially its eligibility.
Impact analysis
Regional Ocean Partnerships (including Regional Coastal and Great Lakes Partnerships)
Narrows the scope of permissible activities and slightly reduces funding.
These partnerships are now explicitly prohibited from using reauthorized federal funds for developing regulatory proposals, model regulations, or compliance programs. Additionally, their authorized appropriations for FY2028-2031 are slightly reduced compared to v1's proposed amounts.
The State of Vermont
Expands eligibility or classification.
Vermont is removed from the list of states that are *not* considered a 'coastal state' for the purposes of defining a 'Regional Great Lakes Partnership'.
Entities involved in regulatory development or enforcement within the scope of Regional Ocean Partnerships
Narrows the funding opportunities for regulatory-focused work.
Regional Ocean Partnerships are now restricted from using federal funds for developing regulatory proposals, model regulations, or compliance programs, which may affect organizations or initiatives that relied on such funding for these activities.