The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 3847·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 11, 2026

Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2026

IntroducedTaxationMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]
Committees
Finance Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 11, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to prevent U.S. companies from reincorporating abroad to avoid U.S. taxes by broadening the criteria under which such "inverted" entities are still treated as domestic for tax purposes, with retroactive effect.

What it actually does

This bill amends Section 7874 of the Internal Revenue Code to significantly expand the definition of "inverted corporations" that are treated as domestic for U.S. tax purposes. It lowers the ownership threshold for a foreign corporation to be considered a "surrogate foreign corporation" from 80% to 60% and introduces a new category of "inverted domestic corporation" based on a 50% ownership test or primary management and control in the U.S. combined with significant domestic business activities. These changes apply retroactively to taxable years ending after May 8, 2014.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill is essential to close tax loopholes that allow profitable U.S. corporations to reduce their tax liability by undergoing corporate inversions, thereby ensuring a fairer tax system and preventing the erosion of the U.S. tax base. They contend that these inversions are often purely for tax purposes, without genuine relocation of business activities, and that the retroactive application is necessary to capture past avoidance.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that the bill could make the U.S. a less attractive place for businesses to incorporate or expand, potentially hindering global competitiveness and investment. They would also strongly criticize the retroactive application of new tax rules, asserting that it creates significant uncertainty, undermines business planning, and can be seen as unfair to companies that acted legally under previous rules.

The bill is short but technically dense, requiring careful reading and understanding of tax code intricacies to grasp its full implications.

Section 2(a), amending IRC Section 7874(b)(1)(A)

Redefinition of Surrogate Foreign Corporation Ownership Threshold

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision changes the threshold for a foreign corporation to be considered a "surrogate foreign corporation" (and thus treated as domestic for tax purposes) from 80% to 60% of its stock being held by former shareholders of the acquired domestic corporation. This means more foreign-parented companies resulting from inversions will be treated as U.S. companies for tax purposes, increasing their U.S. tax liability.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. corporations considering or undergoing inversions where former U.S. shareholders retain between 60% and 80% ownershipImpactIncreased tax liability, as these entities will be treated as domestic corporations for U.S. tax purposes.MechanismDirect amendment to IRC Section 7874(b)(1)(A) lowering the ownership percentage threshold.ScalePotentially significant for companies within this ownership range, leading to higher U.S. tax obligations.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this change broadens the reach of anti-inversion rules, capturing more transactions designed primarily for tax avoidance without substantial business relocation, thereby protecting the U.S. tax base.

Critics contend

Critics might argue this further restricts corporate restructuring options, potentially making the U.S. less competitive globally and discouraging legitimate cross-border mergers.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the goal of preventing tax avoidance by expanding the definition of an inverted corporation against potential impacts on corporate flexibility and international competitiveness.

Section 2(a), amending IRC Section 7874(b)(1)(B) and (b)(2)

New Category: Inverted Domestic Corporation

prominently featuredhighly complex

This provision creates a new definition for an "inverted domestic corporation," which is also treated as domestic for tax purposes. A foreign corporation becomes an inverted domestic corporation if, after May 8, 2014, it acquires substantially all properties of a domestic corporation or partnership, and either more than 50% of its stock is held by former U.S. shareholders/partners, OR its management and control are primarily in the U.S. and it has significant domestic business activities.

Section 2(a), amending IRC Section 7874(b)(3)

Substantial Foreign Business Activities Exception

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision provides an exception to being treated as an "inverted domestic corporation" if the expanded affiliated group has substantial business activities in the foreign country where the entity is organized, when compared to the total business activities of the group. It also grants the Secretary of the Treasury authority to increase the threshold percentage for what constitutes "substantial business activities" in future regulations.

Section 2(a), amending IRC Section 7874(b)(4)

Defining U.S. Management and Control

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This provision directs the Secretary of the Treasury to issue regulations defining when the management and control of an expanded affiliated group are considered to occur primarily within the United States. It specifically states that if substantially all executive officers and senior management who make strategic, financial, and operational decisions are based or primarily located in the U.S., then management and control are considered U.S.-based.

Section 2(a), amending IRC Section 7874(b)(5)

Defining Significant Domestic Business Activities

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This provision defines "significant domestic business activities" for an expanded affiliated group. It states that such activities exist if at least 25% of the group's employees, employee compensation, assets, or income are based or derived in the United States. It also allows the Secretary to issue regulations decreasing this 25% threshold, making it easier to meet the 'significant domestic business activities' test.

Section 2(c)

Retroactive Effective Date

prominently featuredstraightforward

The amendments made by this bill apply to taxable years ending after May 8, 2014. This means the new, expanded anti-inversion rules could retroactively affect the tax status of corporations that completed inversion transactions after that date, potentially leading to unexpected tax liabilities for past years.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this