2 versions

TransformativeWhat changed in REPORTED TO SENATEcompared with INTRODUCED IN SENATE (Feb 4, 2025)

A complete substitute amendment. v2 retains the short title and the amendment to the predisaster hazard mitigation program definitions from v1, but it entirely removes the proposed hazard mitigation revolving loan fund program changes and the new residential retrofit and resilience pilot program. The rule of construction is also updated to reflect these significant deletions, narrowing the bill's scope considerably.

S. 388119th CongressIntroduced Feb 4, 2025

Promoting Resilient Buildings Act

Reported To SenateEmergency ManagementSubstantive

View bill text

Sponsor: Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]
Committees: Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action: Sep 15, 2026

Bottom line

The bill mandates the use of the two most recent consensus-based building codes for projects receiving federal predisaster hazard mitigation funds, aiming to improve resilience and reduce future disaster costs.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, specifically within the predisaster hazard mitigation program. It establishes a new definition for "latest published editions" to mean the two most recently published editions of relevant consensus-based codes, specifications, and standards. This change aims to ensure that federal funding for predisaster mitigation projects supports construction and retrofits adhering to more current and resilient building standards.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that updating the definition of building codes for federal predisaster mitigation ensures that investments are made in the most effective and modern resilience measures. They contend that adopting the latest codes will lead to stronger infrastructure, better protection of lives and property, and ultimately reduce the financial burden of disaster recovery on federal taxpayers by preventing damage before it occurs.

Opponents contend

Critics might express concerns that mandating the use of the two most recently published code editions could place an undue burden on some states and local governments, particularly smaller or less affluent communities. They may argue that adopting and enforcing the very latest codes can be costly and administratively challenging, potentially hindering participation in federal mitigation programs or increasing local construction costs, even if the long-term benefits are clear.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions within the time typically allotted for legislative review.

Section 2(a) of the reported bill, amending Section 203(a) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133(a))

Definition of 'Latest Published Editions' for Predisaster Hazard Mitigation

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Stafford Act to define what constitutes 'latest published editions' within the context of the predisaster hazard mitigation program. It specifies that this term refers to the two most recently published editions of relevant consensus-based codes, specifications, and standards. This means that projects seeking federal funding through this program will be expected to adhere to more up-to-date building and safety standards.

GroupImpactMechanismScale

GroupState and local governmentsImpactIncreased requirements for federal funding eligibilityMechanismMust adopt or adhere to newer building codes for projects funded under the predisaster hazard mitigation program.ScaleBroad, affecting all jurisdictions seeking FEMA predisaster mitigation grants.

GroupConstruction industry and homeownersImpactPotential for higher initial construction/retrofit costs but increased resilienceMechanismProjects will need to meet more stringent, modern building standards, which may involve new materials or techniques.ScaleSpecific to projects receiving federal predisaster mitigation funds.

GroupFederal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)ImpactClarified guidance for program administrationMechanismFEMA will have a clear standard for evaluating the code adherence of predisaster mitigation projects.ScaleInternal administrative impact.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this definition is crucial for ensuring that federal investments in disaster mitigation are truly effective. By requiring adherence to the two most recent code editions, projects will incorporate the latest scientific understanding of hazard resistance, leading to more robust infrastructure and greater protection against future disasters. This proactive approach is seen as a fiscally responsible way to reduce long-term recovery costs.

Critics contend

Opponents, or those with reservations, might contend that while the intent is good, mandating the two most recent code editions could create barriers for communities, especially those with limited resources, that have not yet adopted or cannot afford to implement such updated codes. They might argue for more flexibility, suggesting that a single 'latest edition' or a broader range of acceptable codes could better accommodate diverse local capacities and economic realities.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for optimal disaster resilience through modern building codes against potential challenges for communities in adopting and implementing these newer standards. There's a tension between achieving the highest level of protection and ensuring equitable access to federal mitigation funds for all communities, regardless of their current code adoption status or financial capacity.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.