The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 3955·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 26, 2026

Migrant Crime Reporting Act of 2026

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 26, 2026

Bottom line

The bill creates a federal grant program to incentivize and fund states to collect and report data on criminal offenses committed by individuals lacking specific federal identification documents.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a grant program, administered by the Secretary of Homeland Security, to provide $1,000,000 annually to eligible states. States must use these funds to collect and analyze data from local law enforcement agencies on the number of individuals defined as "migrants" who have been charged with or convicted of criminal offenses. To be eligible, states must have already publicly reported such data in the prior fiscal year.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill addresses a critical data gap by providing states with resources to systematically track and report criminal activity involving non-citizens. They contend that accurate, comprehensive data is essential for understanding the societal impacts of migration, informing policy decisions related to border security and public safety, and ensuring transparency regarding criminal justice outcomes.

Opponents contend

Opponents may argue that the bill could lead to discriminatory data collection practices, potentially stigmatizing migrant communities and fostering xenophobia. They might also raise concerns about the definition of "migrant" being overly broad or potentially misidentifying individuals, and question the utility of such data without broader context on crime rates across all demographics.

The bill is very short and clear, making it easy for any reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 3(a) and Section 2(1)

Establishment of Migrant Crime Reporting Grants

prominently featuredstraightforward

The bill authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to award $1,000,000 annually to each eligible state, starting in fiscal year 2027. To be considered an "eligible State," a state must request the grant and, in the previous fiscal year, have already made publicly available and submitted to the Secretary a "migrant crime report." This creates a prerequisite for states to demonstrate prior reporting before receiving federal funds.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState governmentsImpactReceive federal funding; must meet eligibility criteria.MechanismDirect financial grants from the federal government.Scale$1,000,000 per eligible state annually.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that linking grant eligibility to prior reporting incentivizes states to begin collecting and sharing this crucial data, ensuring that federal funds reward states already committed to transparency and data-driven policy.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that requiring prior reporting could disadvantage states that currently lack the resources or infrastructure to collect such data, making it harder for them to become eligible for the initial funding needed to establish such systems.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the desire to reward proactive states with the potential challenge of excluding states that genuinely need initial support to meet the reporting requirements.

Section 2(2)

Defining "Migrant" for Reporting Purposes

mentioned in summarystraightforward

The bill defines "migrant" as any person unable to present specific valid identification documents, including a Permanent Resident Card (green card), a U.S. birth certificate, a valid U.S. passport, or a Certificate of Citizenship or Naturalization. This definition is central to determining which individuals' criminal offense data will be collected and reported under the grant program.

Section 3(b) and 3(c)

Mandated Data Collection and Public Reporting

prominently featuredstraightforward

States receiving grants must use the $1,000,000 to collect and analyze data from all local law enforcement agencies within their jurisdiction (e.g., county, parish) on the number of "migrants" who have been charged with or convicted of a criminal offense. Furthermore, these states are required to make a "migrant crime report" publicly available on a state website and submit it to the Secretary of Homeland Security for each fiscal year they receive grant funds.

FOUND

This section amends a previously enacted law, "An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14," approved July 4, 2025 (Public Law 119-21), commonly known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," to include "Migrant crime reporting grants" as an authorized use of funds under that act.

Section 4

Why it matters:This is a standard legislative practice for funding new programs by referencing existing omnibus spending bills or reconciliation acts. It streamlines the legislative process but can obscure the ultimate source and total allocation of funds.

Case for: Supporters would argue this is an efficient way to fund a new program without needing a separate appropriations bill, leveraging existing legislative vehicles.

Case against: Critics might argue that embedding new program funding within a larger, previously passed act makes it less transparent and harder for the public to track new spending initiatives.

Estimated impact: The bill authorizes $1,000,000 per eligible state annually, but the total impact depends on the number of eligible states and the overall funding allocated by the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act."

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this