The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 3967·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 3, 2026

FLOWS Act of 2026

IntroducedWater Resources DevelopmentSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 3, 2026

Bottom line

The FLOWS Act of 2026 aims to modernize rural water and wastewater infrastructure through targeted digital technology grants, enhancing efficiency, resilience, and cybersecurity for underserved communities.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a grant program within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to provide financial assistance to rural areas for the adoption and maintenance of digital infrastructure technology in public water systems and treatment works. It authorizes $50 million annually for fiscal years 2027 through 2031 for this program and mandates a Comptroller General study on the impact of these technologies in rural water infrastructure.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is essential for bringing critical digital infrastructure technology to rural water systems, which often lack the resources to adopt modern solutions. They contend it will improve operational efficiency, reduce water loss, enhance cybersecurity, and increase the resilience and affordability of water services in underserved rural areas, ultimately protecting public health and the environment.

Opponents contend

Potential concerns might include the administrative burden on small rural entities to apply for and manage these grants, the long-term sustainability of software maintenance costs beyond the grant period, or whether digital solutions are the most pressing need for all rural systems compared to other fundamental infrastructure repairs.

The bill is short and clearly written, allowing ample time for an informed reader to understand its provisions and implications.

Section 2(b)(1)

Establishment of Rural Area Digital Infrastructure Technology Grant Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator to create a grant program. This program will provide financial assistance to eligible entities in rural areas to design, construct, operate, and maintain digital infrastructure technology for water infrastructure, including drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater systems. It also covers training for project managers and utility operators, and cybersecurity measures.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupPublicly owned public water systems and treatment works in rural areasImpactReceive federal grants for technology upgrades, operational improvements, and cybersecurity enhancements.MechanismDirect federal grant funding administered by the EPA.ScalePotentially widespread across eligible rural entities, improving service delivery and operational efficiency.
GroupRural communities and residentsImpactBenefit from improved water quality, reduced water loss, enhanced system reliability, and potentially more affordable water services.MechanismIndirectly through upgrades to local water infrastructure.ScaleSignificant positive impact on quality of life and public health.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this program is crucial for bringing modern technology to rural water systems, which often lack the resources for such upgrades. It will improve operational efficiency, reduce water loss, and enhance system resilience against physical and cyber threats.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that while beneficial, the program's scope might be too narrow, potentially overlooking other critical infrastructure needs in rural areas that are not digital in nature, or that the administrative burden for small entities could be prohibitive.

Tradeoffs

Balances the need for technological advancement in rural infrastructure against potential administrative complexities for small utilities and the prioritization of other non-digital infrastructure needs.

Section 2(a)(2) and 2(b)(2)

Definition and Use of Digital Infrastructure Technology

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section broadly defines 'digital infrastructure technology' to include remote sensing, real-time monitoring, industrial control systems (like SCADA), artificial intelligence, and digital design software for water systems. Crucially, it explicitly allows grant funds to be used for the initial acquisition and ongoing maintenance costs of software, which is often a significant and recurring expense for utilities.

Section 2(b)(3)

Grant Prioritization for Small and Needy Systems

prominently featuredstraightforward

The Administrator is directed to prioritize grant recipients that own or operate public water systems or treatment works serving fewer than 3,300 people. Additionally, priority is given to entities serving communities deemed 'most in need,' such as pre-fabricated home community organizations controlled by a local public body, or other community-owned/controlled water systems.

Section 2(b)(4)

Funding Authorization

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes $50,000,000 to be appropriated to the EPA Administrator for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031 to carry out the grant program. These funds are to remain available until expended, meaning they do not expire at the end of the fiscal year if not spent.

Section 2(d) and 2(e)

Comptroller General Study on Digital Infrastructure Impact

mentioned in summarystraightforward

The bill mandates the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study within 5 years of enactment to assess the impact of adopting digital infrastructure technology in rural water projects. The study must identify issues like water loss and bottlenecks, and provide recommendations for water resource management, infrastructure prioritization, interoperability, cost reduction, sustainability, and affordability. A report on the study's results and the program's outcomes is due to Congress by December 31, 2030.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this