The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4011·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 5, 2026

Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2026

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]
Committees
Foreign Relations Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 5, 2026

Bottom line

This bill provides a five-year reauthorization of funding for international tropical forest and coral reef conservation efforts through the existing Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act.

What it actually does

This bill reauthorizes the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 1998, extending its funding for five additional fiscal years. It specifically appropriates $20,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2028 through 2032 to continue programs aimed at conserving tropical forests and coral reefs. This ensures the continuation of debt-for-nature swaps and other conservation initiatives under the original Act.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that reauthorizing this Act is crucial for continuing vital international conservation efforts, protecting biodiversity, mitigating climate change through forest preservation, and safeguarding critical marine ecosystems. They emphasize the proven effectiveness of the debt-for-nature swap mechanism in fostering sustainable development and environmental protection in developing countries.

Opponents contend

Potential opponents, if any, might argue against the allocation of U.S. taxpayer dollars to international conservation programs, especially when domestic needs are pressing. They might question the effectiveness or oversight of such programs, or suggest that funds could be better utilized for other foreign policy objectives or domestic priorities.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2

Reauthorization of Appropriations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section extends the authorization for appropriations under the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 1998. It specifically allocates $20,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2028 through 2032, totaling $100,000,000 over five years. This funding supports programs that allow developing countries to reduce their debt to the U.S. in exchange for commitments to conserve tropical forests and coral reefs.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDeveloping countries with tropical forests and coral reefsImpactContinued financial support for conservationMechanismDebt-for-nature swaps and other conservation initiativesScaleSignificant, $20 million annually for 5 years
GroupGlobal environmental organizations and conservationistsImpactContinued funding and operational capacityMechanismGrants and partnerships for conservation projectsScaleEnables ongoing and new projects
GroupU.S. taxpayersImpactFinancial contribution to international conservationMechanismFederal appropriationsScaleMinor, relative to overall federal budget

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this reauthorization is vital for continuing successful programs that protect critical global ecosystems, combat climate change, and preserve biodiversity. They highlight the cost-effectiveness of debt-for-nature swaps in achieving conservation goals while also providing debt relief to partner nations.

Critics contend

Critics, if any, might argue that these funds could be better spent on domestic priorities or that the effectiveness of such international programs warrants closer scrutiny. Some may question the long-term impact of debt-for-nature swaps or the accountability of recipient nations.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension involves balancing domestic spending priorities with international environmental commitments. While the bill aims to address global environmental challenges, it requires a commitment of U.S. federal funds that some might argue could be used elsewhere.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this