The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4014·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 5, 2026

A bill to direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the Nisqually Indian Tribe the Clear Creek Hatchery infrastructure, and for other purposes.

IntroducedNative AmericansSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 5, 2026

Bottom line

The bill transfers ownership of the Clear Creek Hatchery infrastructure from the U.S. government to the Nisqually Indian Tribe without cost, enhancing tribal self-governance over a key natural resource.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to convey all federal right, title, and interest in the Clear Creek Hatchery infrastructure to the Nisqually Indian Tribe within 90 days of enactment. The conveyance includes specific components like ponds, dams, springs, raceways, wells, and associated infrastructure such as pipes, electrical conduits, fences, and roads, as depicted on specified maps. The transfer is to occur without any payment from the Tribe and is subject to existing valid rights.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this conveyance is a vital step in supporting tribal self-determination and sovereignty, allowing the Nisqually Tribe to directly manage a critical resource essential to their cultural heritage, subsistence, and economic well-being. They contend that tribal management can lead to more efficient, culturally appropriate, and environmentally sound operations of the hatchery, aligning with federal trust responsibilities to Native American tribes.

Opponents contend

Critics, if any, might raise concerns about the transfer of federal assets without consideration, potentially viewing it as a loss of federal oversight or control over a public resource. They might also question the precedent set for future tribal land or infrastructure transfer requests, or express concerns about potential impacts on non-tribal stakeholders who may have historically benefited from or relied on the federally managed hatchery operations.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core purpose and provisions within the time given.

Section 1(b)

Conveyance of Clear Creek Hatchery Infrastructure

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Secretary of the Interior transfer full ownership of the Clear Creek Hatchery infrastructure to the Nisqually Indian Tribe. This transfer must happen within 90 days of the bill becoming law. The infrastructure includes a comprehensive list of physical assets like ponds, dams, springs, raceways, and wells, along with all associated pipes, electrical systems, fences, and roads within the hatchery area.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNisqually Indian TribeImpactGains full ownership and control over the Clear Creek Hatchery infrastructure, enhancing self-governance and resource management capabilities.MechanismDirect transfer of all federal right, title, and interest.ScaleSignificant, as it impacts a key tribal resource.
GroupUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)ImpactRelinquishes ownership and operational responsibility for the Clear Creek Hatchery infrastructure, potentially reducing federal maintenance costs.MechanismMandated conveyance by the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the USFWS.ScaleMinor, as it affects a single facility.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that granting the Nisqually Tribe direct control over the hatchery infrastructure is crucial for their ability to manage salmon populations, which are culturally and economically vital. They believe this will lead to more effective and responsive resource management tailored to tribal needs and traditional practices.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that transferring federal assets without consideration could set a problematic precedent or diminish federal control over resources that serve broader public interests. They might also express concerns about ensuring consistent environmental standards or public access under new ownership.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the federal government's trust responsibility and support for tribal sovereignty against potential concerns regarding the divestment of federal assets and the shift in management oversight for a public resource. It prioritizes tribal self-determination over continued federal control.

Section 1(c)

Conveyance Requirements: No Consideration

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section specifies two key conditions for the conveyance: first, it must respect any existing valid rights (meaning prior legal claims or easements remain in effect); and second, the transfer will occur without any payment or exchange of value from the Nisqually Indian Tribe to the United States government. This means the Tribe acquires the infrastructure for free.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this