The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
Back to REPORTED TO SENATE
Comparev1INTRODUCED IN SENATEMar 12→v2REPORTED TO SENATESep 14
SubstantiveINTRODUCED IN SENATE → REPORTED TO SENATE

What changed between these versions

A substantive addition. V2 adds a new subsection 2(c) specifying that no additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the CBP Support Dog Pilot Program. This change clarifies the funding mechanism for the program, mandating its operation within existing appropriations.

Overview

A single, focused change. · V2 clarifies the funding mechanism for the pilot program by explicitly stating that no new appropriations are authorized, thereby imposing a fiscal constraint not present in v1.

The primary change in v2 is the addition of subsection 2(c), which stipulates that no additional funds are authorized for the CBP Support Dog Pilot Program. This clarifies that the program must operate within existing appropriations, rather than receiving new, dedicated funding. All other operative provisions regarding the establishment and duration of the pilot program remain unchanged from v1.

+

Major additions

+
Section 2(c) (new)

This new subsection states that no additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the CBP Support Dog Pilot Program established in Section 2. It explicitly limits the program's funding to existing resources.

This addition is significant as it mandates that the pilot program must be funded through existing appropriations rather than requiring new, dedicated funding. This could impact the scale or implementation of the program if it relies on reallocating existing resources within U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Scope

Minor adjustment within existing scope — The change is concentrated in a single subsection within Section 2, specifically related to the funding of the pilot program. — V2 introduces a fiscal constraint not present in v1, clarifying that the program must operate without new appropriations, which represents a refinement in the program's implementation policy. — The new subsection 2(c) directly interacts with the establishment and operation of the pilot program outlined in subsections 2(a) and 2(b) by imposing a funding limitation on its execution.

Impact analysis

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

CBP faces a new fiscal constraint, potentially limiting the resources available for the program and requiring internal budget adjustments.

CBP is now explicitly required to fund the support dog pilot program using existing appropriations, rather than potentially seeking new, dedicated funds for its implementation.

Ask Ledger AI about this