The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4094·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 12, 2026

Corruption Clawback Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 12, 2026

Bottom line

The 'Corruption Clawback Act' seeks to enhance presidential accountability by requiring the Attorney General to recover taxpayer funds paid to a President if those payments were unduly influenced by their office.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Attorney General to initiate civil actions to recover 'covered payments' made from the U.S. Treasury to an individual while they served as President. These payments must be those that would not have been made but for the individual's presidential status, and relate to claims filed or settlements reached on or after January 20, 2025. The bill also provides courts with specific considerations for determining if a payment was contingent on presidential status and directs recovered funds to the Public Integrity Section of the Department of Justice.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill is a vital step to prevent potential corruption and ensure accountability for the highest office. They contend it closes a critical loophole where presidential influence could lead to personal financial gain from taxpayer-funded settlements or judgments, thereby restoring public trust and upholding the integrity of the presidency. The specified court considerations provide necessary guardrails against arbitrary enforcement.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that this bill is politically motivated, potentially targeting specific individuals or future administrations, and could create a chilling effect on legitimate claims a President might have. They may also contend that the criteria for recovery are overly broad or vague, leading to subjective interpretations and potential harassment, and that existing ethics laws are sufficient to address such concerns.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, allowing an informed reader to fully understand its provisions in a matter of minutes.

Section 1

Short Title

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section formally names the Act the 'Corruption Clawback Act.' This provides a concise and easily recognizable name for the legislation, facilitating its reference and discussion in legal and public discourse.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral Public and Legal CommunityImpactProvides a clear, consistent reference name for the legislation.MechanismEstablishes the official short title.ScaleMinor

Supporters argue

Supporters would state that establishing a clear short title is standard legislative practice, making the bill easier to identify and discuss.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision as it is a procedural naming convention.

Tradeoffs

None.

Section 2

Definition of 'Covered Payment'

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section defines a 'covered payment' as any monetary settlement, administrative award, or court-ordered judgment that is paid from the U.S. Treasury to an individual while they served as President. Crucially, it must be a payment that would not have occurred but for their presidential status, and it must relate to claims filed or settlements reached on or after January 20, 2025. This definition establishes the precise scope of payments subject to recovery.

Section 3(a) and 3(b)

Attorney General's Mandate and Court Considerations for Recovery

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates the Attorney General to bring a civil action in either the U.S. Court of Federal Claims or the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to recover any 'covered payment.' It further instructs courts to consider specific factors when determining if a payment was contingent on presidential status. These factors include whether authorizing officials were presidential appointees or personal counsel, if the payment exceeds typical payouts for similar claims by private citizens, or if standard legal defenses were bypassed.

Section 3(c)

Allocation of Recovered Funds

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section specifies that any 'covered payment' successfully recovered by the Attorney General under this Act shall be used by the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice. This earmarks the recovered funds for a specific unit within the DOJ responsible for investigating and prosecuting public corruption.

Section 4

Comptroller General Report on Large Payments

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section requires the Comptroller General to submit a report to Congress within 180 days after any 'covered payment' exceeding $1,000,000 is made. The report must include an analysis based on the same considerations outlined in Section 3(b) for courts, effectively providing congressional oversight on significant payments that could potentially fall under the 'corruption clawback' criteria.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this