The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
S. 4135·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 18, 2026

FLAP Reauthorization Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 18, 2026

Bottom line

This bill provides consistent, multi-year funding for the Federal lands access program, supporting infrastructure improvements for public access to federal lands.

What it actually does

This bill reauthorizes the Federal lands access program (FLAP) by specifying annual appropriations from the Highway Trust Fund for fiscal years 2027 through 2031. It allocates a total of $1,619,975,000 over these five years to ensure continued funding for projects that improve transportation access to federal lands, including national parks, forests, and wildlife refuges.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that reauthorizing FLAP funding is crucial for maintaining and improving transportation infrastructure leading to and within federal lands, which enhances visitor experiences, supports local economies dependent on tourism, and ensures safe access for recreation and resource management. They emphasize the importance of predictable, multi-year funding for effective planning and execution of these vital projects.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while access to federal lands is important, the specific funding levels or the allocation method from the Highway Trust Fund could be subject to scrutiny, especially if there are competing infrastructure priorities or concerns about the solvency of the fund. Some might also question the efficiency of the program's administration or suggest alternative funding mechanisms.

The bill text is exceptionally short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for anyone to understand its direct provisions.

Section 2

Reauthorization of Federal Lands Access Program Funding

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes specific amounts of money to be appropriated from the Highway Trust Fund (excluding the Mass Transit Account) for the Federal lands access program (FLAP) for five fiscal years, from 2027 to 2031. The funding starts at $313,975,000 in 2027 and increases incrementally each year, reaching $333,975,000 by 2031. This ensures a steady financial stream for projects that improve roads and other transportation facilities providing access to federal lands.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupVisitors to federal lands (national parks, forests, wildlife refuges)ImpactImproved access, safer roads, enhanced recreational opportunities.MechanismFunding for infrastructure projects (roads, bridges, trails).ScaleNational, affecting millions of visitors annually.
GroupLocal communities near federal landsImpactEconomic benefits from tourism, job creation in construction and maintenance.MechanismIncreased visitor spending, infrastructure development.ScaleRegional and local economic impact.
GroupFederal land management agencies (e.g., NPS, USFS, FWS)ImpactAbility to plan and execute long-term access improvement projects, better resource management.MechanismStable, dedicated funding stream.ScaleOperational and strategic planning.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that consistent, multi-year funding for FLAP is essential for maintaining and upgrading critical infrastructure that supports public access to national treasures. This investment not only improves safety and visitor experience but also stimulates local economies and helps preserve natural resources by managing visitor flow effectively.

Critics contend

While direct opposition to funding access to federal lands is rare, critics might argue that the specific allocation amounts could be re-evaluated against other pressing national infrastructure needs or that the Highway Trust Fund's long-term solvency should be prioritized, potentially suggesting alternative funding sources or more stringent project selection criteria.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension involves balancing the need for robust funding for federal lands access with the broader demands on the Highway Trust Fund and other national infrastructure priorities. There's also a balance between facilitating access and managing potential environmental impacts of increased visitation.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this